Open Science Feed

573 readers

1 users here now

Open science, open research or open scholarship, is an increasingly important discussion topic. However, it can be difficult to know where to go for information. This subreddit will collate the latest from the world of open science, including but not limited to open access, open data, open education, open peer review, and open source.

We use term science in the international sense: from the natural sciences to the humanities and everything in between.

We are also on

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

GrassrootsReview@lemmy.ml

Facilitating open science without sacrificing IP rights. A novel tool for improving replicability of published research. (www.embopress.org)

submitted 2 years ago by GrassrootsReview@lemmy.ml to c/openscience@lemmy.ml

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Lofi published this on Reddit asking:

I came across this paper - https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202255841 (through r/Open_Access_tracking)

It made me think: Most of the discourse I know about research materials and open science is centered around the idea of public access.

But maybe public access is not vital? What do you think about providing controlled, on-demand access? I mean, public access is preferable, but in practice, public access deters some scientists (due to various reasons, not necessarily IP as the paper assumes), and so we are ending with no access at all. Perhaps providing some access is better than nothing.

What do you think - would society benefit from such on-demand access or should we insist on public access only?

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here