Games

16812 readers

320 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

566

Starfield is now mostly negative in recent reviews (store.steampowered.com)

submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

268 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 5) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

It's bad

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

One of the most unjustified review bombings in recent years, IMO. The game is very much a standard Bethesda game, and is fine. Mods and DLCs are what people buy Bethesda games for, anyways.

Don't get me wrong, Bethesda themselves are very mediocre game devs, but their specific style of game lends itself well to modding.

Starfield is just as mediocre as Skyrim and Fallout 4, everyone who made Morrowind great is gone, Bethesda games ride on the success of their modding communities.

[–] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago

Starfield probably hasn't lived up to anyone's expectations but people are acting like it's not a solid game still.

load more comments