this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

C++

1787 readers
2 users here now

The center for all discussion and news regarding C++.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
farados@vlemmy.net
Nihili0@programming.dev
lysdexic@programming.dev
8
Why does the compiler complain about a missing constructor when I'm just resizing my std::vector to a smaller size? (devblogs.microsoft.com)
submitted 1 year ago by gracicot@programming.dev to c/cpp@programming.dev
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Arkaniol@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you. But why not just init the vector std::vector vect(56) And then resize ๐Ÿง

[โ€“] KRAW@linux.community 1 points 1 year ago

That vector constructor still requires a default constructor for the class of the object contained by the vector, so it's the same issue but different context.