Exception for YouTube Video Posters:
Notably, any account that has posted one or more videos on YouTube will be exempt from the account purge, regardless of the period of inactivity. This exception ensures that users who have contributed content to the platform will not lose their accounts.
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37742 readers
490 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not the first time. Besides, they won't even let you log into old accounts that don't have recovery emails and real names set. I lost a couple of really good usernames from the beta era after they rolled out all of their account protection practices. A password isn't good enough for Google.
They’ve got a “real names” rule?
They haven’t applied it against the online pseudonyms I’ve been using for the past 30 years. Thankfully.
They wouldn't let me log into a couple of accounts despite having the password, saying that I hadn't used it for awhile and they couldn't verify I was the account owner. Since there was no recovery email set, which was intentional because it was supposed to be an anonymous account, and none of the other information I set was real, they said they can't verify me and won't let me log in. They're pretty insistent that passwords alone aren't acceptable, even when you use all of your real information. Go try to log into Google on a new device from a new location and see what a huge PITA it is.
Ah; that explains it; I have multiple accounts cross-linked as recovery accounts. Sounds like I’ll be fine as long as I don’t run afoul of their “inactive” rules.
It was disappointing. I had uber1337 and lost it due to them refusing to let me log back in. That name doesn't mean much now, but it was pretty l33t back then.
Edit: I guess it's actually a pretty stupid name now that there's a taxi company named Uber. Cool, I just made peace with losing that account. Haha!
They can leverage these terms if they want to. For example you’re also only allowed to have one account per person.
Wasn’t it the Terraria dev who got his account locked and they used that as an excuse as to why he was locked out of his account? They said he had too many accounts or something?
They can enforce arbitrary rules when they need to if they wanna fuck you over; just like cops.
I do only have one account with them now. They're a terrible platform these days if you want an anonymous spam account. They were good back in the day because they offered 10x the storage as everyone else, and we hadn't fully comprehended the scope of their snooping. My only email address with them now is used as a corporate spam address, since it's completely overrun with spam anyways, after 20+ years of use.
I hope this doesn't mean they will be opening up the email addresses for use after they delete/clear them
I think that would be a security nightmare, so they probably won't (and they'll probably be forced to not do it if they try)
When deleting a Google account, they warn you about your username won't be reclaimable. So I assume this will be the same.
an inactive Google account is one that has not been used for a continuous period of two years. Google defines "activity" as actions such as signing in to read or send emails, using Google Drive, watching YouTube videos, sharing photos, or downloading apps.
That feels okay to me?
It is, though 2 years is a little short. I just got back into my very first Yahoo e-mail not long ago and that wouldn't have been possible with a policy like this.
But, they have so many that have been stagnant for so long so I'm not really faulting them for this particular move.
Microsoft killed off my pre-MS Hotmail account years back. Google’s got lots of company with the 2 years rule.
Signing in to what, though?
I have one account that only ever gets used via a third party email client. When I check my email, am I “signing in” by Google’s definition or not?
Yes, your 3rd party email client uses your username and password to SIGN IN, which constitutes as signing in for Google.
Are you sure? I’ve had accounts before where only signing in to the official web UI or client counted (because that’s where they showed ads and grabbed telemetry).
So while WE would consider using third party clients to be signing in, THEY may define it differently.
Oof. What do I do with all those websites referring to my other gmail account I never use... I don't want my main gmail to receive these messages.
Sign into it at least once a year.
I thought they had already done it. I got the notification months ago.
yes, they did, but the actual pruning starts from december.
Ah that explains it. Thanks!
Do it mf. DO IT!!!!!
So. Years back. When they did that ad where parents sent a kid emails to their own Gmail and then gave them the account details when they were grown up... Everyone who ever did that are gonna lose all their work if they don't think to log in periodically. Nice.
Stop threatening me with a good time.