this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
172 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2797 readers
18 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lavendedreams@waveform.social 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like y'all are taking the steps needed to protect your community, even if it's a bit inconvenient.

[–] aka_oscar@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Unfortunate situation, but I understand the lack of tools to deal with it left you guys no choice.

Do you happen to know how long this defederation is going to take? Or rather, are tools being developed as we speak or still being discussed? Im glad this is temporary yet if its gonna be like this for years itd prove to be very limiting and isolating.

I also understand its not easy to give the mod position to anyone who requests it, but id encourage you to look for the right people in a more vehement manner. It would be downright frustrating if this situation happens again due to a lack of manpower.

One last thing: The defederation being effective Inmediately was very detrimental to users who subscribed to comms from those instances. Its already shocking to lose access to a comm you were a part of, a heads up and a couple hours/a day would help many of us be at least aware of the situation and not be blindsighted by it. I understand the pressure to do it asap, but i still think it should be notified beforehand.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Unsurprisingly this has made some people very ANGY. So much of the anger is coming from the sort of people that it validates to me that I'd rather be a part of a "lib SJW hugbox" run by "dictators" than whatever those people see as their ideal community. Why is it that freedom of speech maximalists are never pleasant people?

Of course it's not an ideal solution, but barring better moderation tools it seems like the least bad solution when considering Beehaw's goals, which don't include 100% unfettered free speech or having to federate with every single other Lemmy instance out there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Calvinball@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I made an account here after reading the mission statement. The very ideals beehaw stands for were the appeal. I support what you are doing, I want this to continue to feel a safe space.

[–] GhostMagician@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I find ironic is that there has been so much encouragement to not be a lurker and comment. But, it's by logging out and being a lurker that you can actually see new content not available on your instance once a defed happens even if you subscribed.

[–] 21trillionsats@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

I definitely do find this a little disappointing as I think the Lemmy community is too small at the moment to create unnecessary divides and schisms. Success in my mind is predicated on many communities from Reddit coming to servers and forming a common denominator community that achieves critical mass.

It’s clear to me that some of the communities on the 2 you are defederating from you instance have become more popular and are already the defacto “place to be” for certain subreddits.

All that said, I’m happy that my main server (infosec.pub) has not unfederated from those 2 instances so I am able to still participate on those 2 servers AND interact here on my “main” account. This lets me get the best of both worlds. It’s very exciting to see the Lemmy model working in that regard!

[–] saiyan@vlemmy.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can honestly get into private torrent trackers faster than I can get approved to post on beehaw, and they have more a legal risk then this site will have.

I am really tired of “exclusivity”, and dealing with it in lemmy is really annoying.

can't you make instances that you all don't really like read only so users can at least read only.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhc02@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I have no idea whether this is the right decision or the wrong decision, but kudos to you for stepping up and making a decision.

[–] small44@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it still possible to subscribe to communities from those two instances?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rimlogger@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Geez, the concept of federation is already splintering. I understand you guys have your reasons but this just splinters the fediverse and makes it worse for users.

[–] Limeade@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes things better for users who want a well moderated space. These sites are public, so it's not like you can't log out to view what's going on in a community if you still want to follow it. It'll probably end up being similar to how redditors interact with tweets, if someone sees something interesting they probably will screenshot/copy it and pop it into a community they do have an account with to continue the discussion there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halictuz@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've read somehwhere that lemmy.world now requires an email at least. Not sure if that changes anything at all though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autonomous@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry to see you go 😥

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›