this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
172 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2797 readers
19 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nivenkos@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This does much more harm than good IMO - splintering the community at such a sensitive time of growth is a bad idea.

Hopefully there'll be the ability to block images in comments and posts, and better tools for blocking / detecting spammers, and cross-instance bans, auto-moderating hyperlinks, etc. soon.

But the demand for unilateral access to other communities' content is disturbing. The Lemmy federation works because of reciprocity.

Definitely won't be recommending beehaw for new users now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jimrob4@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (16 children)

New users: "I'm tired of Reddit telling me what I can't see! Top-down decision-making is ridiculous! I'm going to check out Lemmy!"

Beehaw: "Hold my beer and watch this."

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] amortized_cost@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I've been lurking this place for quite a few days now and I realized that this place is heavily censored beyond my comfort zone. It's perfectly fine. Just not for me. Goodbye. I won't miss you just like you won't me.

[–] SindriDeLaMancha@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"we have a list of improvements we’d like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible" so out of curiosity whats on that list

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Owaissa@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Plenty of responses here but adding mine in the spirit of open discussion. I appreciate this step. Was starting to see too many posts that I didn’t want and worried that this was going to do the way of other socials I’ve already left. I’m looking forward to tracking the growth of the fediverse and appreciate the thoughtful approach.

Newbie user here. You've gotta do what you gotta do. Thank you for fostering this as a safe space, both for the users and also yourselves as admins. This community doesn't work at all for anyone if it doesn't work for you.

Full support on defederation from me - if we lose a couple folks jumping ship to other instances over this then maybe that's also for the best too.

[–] wxboss@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

I made a comment earlier that I was disappointed by this decision, but after looking through other instances, I have changed my mind and now approve of this move. I'm glad to be here on beehaw where the integrity of the community comes first and is guarded with the best of intentions.

[–] marco@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have nothing intelligent to add (except signaling my support) and to remark that defederation and defenestration are incredibly close words.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tookmyname@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems a bit much. Get moderators.

[–] fishy_2_0@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

they have moderators but the situation was just that bad and keep in mind moderators are volunteers and you cant just assign anyone to it either and when given the choice of keep moderator and admin time from other important issues or simply do something about the problem they chose the second its not an ideal solution but it is a solution

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] edo@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, given your goals for Beehaw. Thanks for articulating your POV so clearly.

[–] Tordoc@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Completely agree with this decision, and it actually comes as a bit of a relief; I saw a statistically significant number of lemmy.world users who admitted to being denied from Beehaw because they didn't want to "write an essay" or aggressively disagreed with the disabled downvotes (something that I've grown to appreciate).

I'm expect that the large influx of disruptive users is from the reddit migration, and I'm hopeful that the majority of the users will either adapt to the culture we're trying to build here, or find their own niches in other communities. As you noted in your post, and in my own experience moderating real life groups, allowing a disruptive influence in a safe space can have serious negative effects on group cohesion that can persist for a long time, if it doesn't alter the culture outright.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Halvdan@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

I completely understand and support the decision to cut the ties, even if it is unfortunate that it should be necessary. This is a nice instance and I hope it can stay that way, even for the mods. I have no idea how much work and perseverance it takes to run something like this but I know I couldn't do it. If the people running Beehaw say that it is too much to handle, then we should believe them. Without them, this would not be the nice place it is. I'm on Sopuli myself, but I like the vibe here and would hate to see it destroyed by trolls. Just my two cents. Cheers.

[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Started on lemmy.world but came here because of the flood of toxic users over there. Seems like the right call for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bilb@lem.monster 7 points 1 year ago

This is all well and good, but in practical terms it means that if your account is not on beehaw then you should divest your involvement with beehaw communities because it is less likely to remain federated with your home instance. Which may be what the beehaw community wants, from the sound of it.

[–] ipha@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I strongly disagree with this decision -- as lemmy progresses and stabilizes, open registrations will become normal and just blocking open instances will not be a viable solution.

I can't say if this is just a need for better mod tooling or a fundamental problem with federation, but it's certainly concerning.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shiftleft@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

[Newbie question] I have seen and subscribed to one lemmy.world community (ProgrammerHumor), I can see it in Beehaw, I haven't tried to post yet but how does this defederation works? Its only in one way so I can see these instances communities by searching explicitly for them?

PS: I tried to find the answer in the comments but could not reach any conclusion sorry...

[–] CarnivorousCouch@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

As I understand it, your copy of that community will no longer update. There is a cached copy of the community on the Beehaw server, so you'll see it and can seemingly post, but you're posting to a copy of the community rather than the live community, and your posts will only be seen by other Beehaw users. To circumvent this, you'd need two accounts (or an account on an instance federated with both Beehaw and Lemmy.world, maybe?)

[–] fancypants@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Does this mean that Beehaw users can't access other instances?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Helix@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If anyone has an issue with defederating to reduce stress (and worse) for our volunteer mods, please watch the Documentary "The Cleaners" (2018) about how moderators in Manila for Facebook, YouTube, Twitter & Co. got PTSD (and worse) from moderating content. Or at least this video about the traumatic life of a Facebook moderator by The Verge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] projectazar@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (18 children)

This is going to be a learning process I think for a lot of people. Not just on federation, but on community building as well. You all seem to be trying to build something here, and I am willing to be patient and participate while it grows. If we get down the road and it just isn't working, I have faith that there will be open discussion on how to make this community grow while maintaining its ethos and we'll be here to figure out what is best for each of us individually.

Good on you for taking decisive action at these early stages while we figure out what we want, where we want to go, and how we want to get there on this relatively new platform.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] DarkWasp@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your hard work and for creating this community, I hope it can continue to thrive. Still adjusting and taking everything in but it’s enjoyable!

[–] s3npai@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

You guys rock, and I absolutely love the heart and should you are putting into it. Thank you for your time and effort to give us all an amazing, caring environment!!!

[–] Liempong_pagong@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm in support of temporary defederation, if just to hold out until better tools come around to moderate things coming from outside Beehaw.

I've visited Lemmy.world and there are people there mocking other instances for having a tighter registration policy and not having an open registration. They say we are gatekeeping. But even if we try to explain, I think they wouldn't understand what the reasons are.

Frankly, they are chaotic there. I will be eager to watch the developments in the coming weeks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›