this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
32 points (97.1% liked)

UK Politics

3103 readers
396 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, she is a fascist piece of shit.

[–] snacks 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they usually love police though, they need them to stomp on commies and whatever else they dont like because they have no actual balls to do it themselves. Facists use the police to terrorise the working classes. Shes not a facist, shes just a dickhead

[–] Devi@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

We have the wrong kind of police in this country for that. Old school would relish the chance to give protesters a kicking, but the training in the last decade has been focussed on conflict resolution and mental health awareness.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She wants to get fired.

One of the theories going round at the moment is Sunak will jump ship mid next year leaving Braverman to lead the party into the election.

By getting fired she removes herself from leadership.

[–] snacks 7 points 1 year ago

Boris did exactly this to Theresa May when foreign secretary

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So why doesn't she just quit then? What's the significance of being fired?

[–] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe she can paint herself as a maverick who 'spoke truth to power', 'I'm being silenced', all that routine?

[–] mannycalavera 2 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing it's money. It's all about money with this lot.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sunak doesn’t have the balls to do it.

I think he’s hoping she can prevent the right of their base from splitting to Reform. Whilst also providing some distance between him and the extreme ideas she’s spouting.

Edit: this aged poorly

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sunak doesn’t have the balls to do it.

Ordinarily, yes, you're right. But Starmer has been concentrating his fire on Braverman and Sunak being weak about her. "She's leading the party, and its somewhere nasty, and you're too weak to do anything about it." And that line is getting quite lot of traction in the media. He might have to fire her to avoid looking weak. Every time she says something awful and he doesn't fire her, he just looks weaker and less electable.

[–] Devi@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a lot of talk about him not wanting to look electable. He's been accussed of priming up his post PM career ready for the general, like here - https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/nov/03/labour-accuses-rishi-sunak-of-angling-for-job-after-elon-musk-interview

There's a lot more money in the title of former prime minister than there is in the job itself.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rishi Sunak did not clear Home Secretary Suella Braverman's article attacking the Metropolitan Police for its handling of pro-Palestinian protests.

Writing in The Times, Ms Braverman accused the force of applying a "double standard" to its policing of protests.

She claimed aggressive right-wing protesters were "rightly met with a stern response", while "pro-Palestinian mobs" were "largely ignored".

The ministerial code says all major interviews and media appearances, both print and broadcast, should "be agreed with the No 10 Press Office".

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has joined calls for Mr Sunak to sack Ms Braverman over the article.

Sir Keir accused the home secretary of undermining the police and said Mr Sunak was "too weak to do anything about it".


The original article contains 206 words, the summary contains 120 words. Saved 42%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!