this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2022
56 points (96.7% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
598 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bkrl@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No spam and no identifiers (phone number, email, ids, etc.) by design. Local encrypted sign-in. Your whole chat system-in-a-file .zip. Disposal, one-time, connections. This is awesome!

[–] Lynda@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

Having unique one-time (non-reusable) invite ID is great.

The wat SimpleX uses one-way queues, and then distributes those queues among servers offers a way to mitigate communication correlation (if the servers are independent and won't collude). Or you can just self host and not worry. Self hosting an onion service is easy.

Running SimpleX through a tor proxy (or VPN) offers even more advantages (if you think you need them).

Perhaps the only downside is SimpleX still controls who gets to be a public server (anyone can self host or offer servers, but they won't be integrated). I have no way of knowing if the servers are owned by a single entity. This part is not "open".

[–] ndr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I really like the concept but I never managed to convince anyone in real life to use it with me. lmao

Edit: I’ve just realized this post is from 7 months ago; why did someone bump this now?

[–] Matt_Shatt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s happening everywhere. The default sort on many of these apps is “hot” and posts from years ago are being shown like they’re new.

[–] nicknoxx 1 points 1 year ago

Also many new users, like me, are looking through everything to see what to subscribe to. A couple of new comments on an old thread and it gets bumped.

[–] bkrl@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

This is not a new Signal, this makes Signal obsolete.

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

SimpleX > Session > Signal in terms of metadata.

On Signal, your user id is your phone number, a directly identifying piece of information. That is a major point of weakness in terms of metadata reduction, usernames would remedy this significantly.

On Session, your user id is anonymous, a randomized string of numbers and letters. However, this user identifier is persistent, meaning if multiple people were found messaging that single randomized ID, that is data about that user even though it the id is randomized.

On SimpleX (although you do have to option to have a persistent ID on top of using this), every conversation uses a randomized user id you send to your contact via a QR code or link. This means in terms of identifying you're talking to the right person, SimpleX is weaker as if someone hijacks the link, they can impersonate you. The links are one time only, so you have to make sure you transfer the link securely (i.e. QR code via encrypted video call, a message on another secure messenger, or scanning the QR code in person). Once you establish the connection however, SimpleX is a more private experience because of the lack of a persistent user identifer. This also means no spam, ever!

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] plain@szmer.info 4 points 2 years ago

Simplex doesn't need phone number so its different from signal

[–] DreadTowel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Looks good in principle! I’ve yet to try using it with anybody.

[–] root@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Looks nice! Is it self-hostable? Or I guess because it's decentralized, the chat history/ etc is saved only between clients?

[–] Kyoyeou@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This ? Already existed? Isn't this like Olvid?

load more comments
view more: next ›