this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
169 points (96.2% liked)

Cool Guides

4692 readers
2 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
169
soil texture triangle (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by can@sh.itjust.works to c/coolguides@lemmy.ca
 

Bonus Canadian edition:

Courtesy of @Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net and !soilscience@slrpnk.net

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don’t understand how to read the top one.

So the “a” in “loam” in the middle-bottom, it’s at an intersection of 3 lines. If I follow those lines to each side I see that loam is 60% clay, 40% silt, 60% sand, and 40% sand.

Ok, maybe I’m not supposed to follow the grey lines, but the cardinal directions? To the left, loam is 20% clay, to the right 80% silt, and below 50% sand.

The more I try to understand this chart the more confused I get.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Follow the orientation of the numbers. On the left, horizontal lines. On the bottom SE to NW lines (\) On the right, NE to SW lines (/)

So, loam is 20% clay, 40% sand, 40% silt.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need a second backslash character for one to display. Currently the \ isn't displaying.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Fixed thanks!

[–] Ashen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Oh shit, make sense now. Thank you!

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the link is !soilscience@slrpnk.net

some info:

the equilateral triangle (US) one is confusing as fuck, if you're uninformed. Basically, start with two lines, and see where they take you (e.g., 30% clay, 40% sand). The third line tells you what the remaining percentage of the 3rd textural size is (e.g., in this case, silt).

In the Right angle Triangle (Canadian one) sand and clay to derive your texture. silt is implied (e.g., solve for 'x').

gravel gets counted later, and classified as coarse fragments.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't realize there was one unique size for gravel. I'd call gravel anything from slightly bigger than sand to bit smaller than a golf ball.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bruh, there's tons of different sizes for gravel and coarse fragments:

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right that's what I mean! Your first graph made it seem like there was just that one size. That table is super interesting thanks.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Haha, check out my soil science community. There are rabbit holes (and pictures of holes!) A-plenty there

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Took me a while too. The left numbers “clay” are the gray lines that are flat (left to right), the right numbers “silt” go top-right to bottom-left and the bottom numbers “sand” go bottom-right to top left.

The intersection of any point is the sum of the 3 numbers and always equals 100. So for example, to get “silty clay loam” (middle right side). You follow the 30% for clay line, then the 60% for silt and finally 10% for sand. Those three equals 100%.

I kept doing what you were too and could not understand why I kept getting over 100% until someone else explained it to me.

[–] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I get it. The arrows on the labels show the direction to read, but aren’t actually by the percentage the represent. Sand percentages are on the left, silt on the bottom, and clay on the right?

This chart would benefit from color coding the lines and moving the labels and arrows to the values that you’re supposed to read.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Not quite. Clay is on the left. Its numbers go from 0 on the bottom left to 100% at the top point and are the flat ones that are horizontal. Silt is on the right and start 0% at the point and go to 100% in the bottom right. Its lines are the diagonal ones that go down and to the left. Finally sand starts with 0 on the bottom right and goes to 100% on the bottom left. Those lines go diagonally up and to the right.

[–] Gordon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

From my understanding, the grey lines are for the silt and clay axis, the sand axis is just read vertically and there are no lines.

[–] youRFate@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Learned about this from dwarf fortress.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

That was my immediate thought.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 year ago

Geotech class was great for a bunch of graphs that made you go WTF in what they were trying to show in a way that made sense visually.

The lab was really fun, though.

[–] LogarithmicCamel 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How come clay isn't 100% clay?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It has to do with classification of the soil type. Soils with high clay content function similarly in regard to the soil chemistry and in most fields: hydraulic flow. Soils with such a clay component to be designated as just "Clay" will have consistent structure characteristics and act as a restrictive layer.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How can clay loam be 30% clay, 70% silt and 50% sand?

[–] atocci@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're reading the chart wrong, you have to follow the axis lines that match the angle of the numbers

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think I see what you mean, but really then you're only ever looking at soil made up of two types. Clay loam could be 30 clay / 70 silt, or 60 clay / 40 sand, or 30 silt / 70 sand. That doesn't make sense, because you could also, for example have a 30 clay / 70 silt in the sandy clay loam or silty clay loam regions - the 3rd thing is supposed to tell you where along the line you stop, yet whenever you do that you have 3 percentages that add up to more than 100%.

Maybe you wouldn't call it 50% sand, and instead pick one of the sand diagonals to get a point in the clay loam region, but no matter how I look at it the percentages don't add up.

[–] atocci@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No I think you're still misunderstanding. For example, here I've chosen a random point in the clay loam section of the chart. We can follow the three lines to the numbers on the sides of the triangle and see that this clay loam would be made up of 30% clay, 30% silt, and 40% sand. You have to follow the lines that match the angle of the number on the side of the chart you are looking at.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're misinterpreting the lines. Each number only corresponds to the line perpendicular to the 100 point on their axis, and each line only corresponds to one number, not the 2 it looks like it connects to.

So for example, if you're looking at the middle-top point of the "clay loam" category, right above the 'l', you get 30% sand/40% clay/30% silt.

*I whipped up a rough layout that better indicates which number goes to which line: https://files.catbox.moe/ljm6ih.png. Would be even better with the numbers aligned more precisely, but it's not worth the effort for all that.