Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers

662 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

259

Anti Piracy VP Says "Any Device" That Can Be Used To Infringe IP Should Be Made Illegal (reclaimthenet.org)

submitted 1 year ago by c0mmando@links.hackliberty.org to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

170 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The ongoing and often extreme and overreaching battle against piracy within the audiovisual industry continues to escalate, with recent discussions focusing on devices capable of infringing intellectual property (IP) rights. As stated by Sheila Cassells, Executive VP at the Audiovisual Anti-Piracy Alliance (AAPA), companies in the entertainment sector should be wary of “any technological development” that could potentially grant access to pirated content.

From historical technology like the VCR to modern advances like AI, all technology holds inherent potentials for piracy.

At the center of these discussions are specific devices including set-top boxes, Firesticks, and Android apps, often condemned for enabling piracy. The AAPA’s somewhat radical standpoint is a call to outlaw the production, marketing, and distribution of any such device.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ahh 'technological development'. I've been to the museum and learned how paper is made. And how ballpoint pens are made. Would that constitute technology or are we allowed to use pens and paper?

But the linked interview within the linked article mainly talks about IPTV and video streaming. I think this clickbaity title is taking things out of context.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Well that’s stupid. I could infringe IP by carving a gloved mouse on a stone tablet. Are you gonna ban stone tablets? And hands? Jesus, Sheila, get a grip.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't we already pay something extra on each device, because it could be used (how democratic) to handle pirated media?

If so, discussion done.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

In plenty of jurisdictions yeah, a copying levy

[–] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Wow. You mean people might gave to read actual books for entertainment?

If by some miracle the legal establishment takes this schmuck seriously, it is the end of the entertainment industry.

[–] Timbo303@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This would ban your own PC, and capture cards entirely. Theres no way around piracy existing just face it.

load more comments