this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
826 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12759 readers
973 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 56 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Especially when you have one employee trying to cover the entire 16,000 square foot store. She isn't able to stop checking people out to come help me get allergy medicine? It's pretty bad when Walmart provides a better experience .

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] improbablypoopingrn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now do one about the overworked pharmacists

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I wish the pharmacy was still owned by the pharmacist

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (7 children)

No shit. There was briefly an electronics store in the 90s where literally everything was priced low, but it was allllll locked up, either behind glass or held to the countertop with a security wire. I can't even remember the name of it. It was like grand opening, grand closing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Honestly, the first thing i thought when hearing those measures was that it would only highlight how much more convenient online shopping is versus the store.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Just recently, my wife wanted an eyebrow pencil, so we popped into a drugstore. All the makeup stuff was behind locked cabinets. We just turned around and went to a different store.

It seems like a particularly bad idea for anything that people might want to look at different versions of. If I wanted AA batteries that were locked, I might be okay saying, "Hey, can you grab me the batteries?" But for something that I want to look through the options, I'm not going to do that with the employee standing there tapping their foot.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reminds me of getting the guy to unlock the video game and he hands me the game thinking we are gonna go ring it up, and I am just standing reading the back of the case, only to put it back and ask for another one.

Just ends up being me and Walmart bro shopping for a game together

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 66 points 3 days ago (5 children)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 107 points 3 days ago (2 children)

paywalled

Headline is right.
'When you lock things up…you don't sell as many of them’

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Reminder, using the reader function in Firefox skips almost all pay walls.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Retail will migrate even more to online shopping where it can't be shoplifted

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then it's just package theft

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but the company already has your money, so they don't really care. Package theft is only a problem for us plebs to deal with.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, my local Walmart is expanding their caged goods selection and they have been removing call buttons.

Its time to invest in vending machines.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

If theft is this bad, these stores should just switch back to the traditional model used by pharmacies and general stores. Consider this photo of a traditional pharmacy:

Or this old general store:

This is what these businesses used to look like. In traditional pharmacies and general stores, most goods were kept behind counters or at the very least within direct view of those behind counters. A traditional dry good store might literally just be a big counter in the front with a huge warehouse in the back. You show up with a list of goods you want, and the clerk would run into the back and grab everything you wanted.

The model of a store with aisles that customers wander through is not the historical norm. As industrialization improved, the relative costs of goods lowered, while the relative cost of labor increased. So it made sense for stores to accept a higher level of theft and shopliting by offloading the item-picking process to their customers. They got the customers to do a lot of the work for them, but in exchange they accepted a higher level of theft.

Now they're trying to have things both ways. They still want customers to do all the work of picking out their purchases from the shelves, but they've decided they don't like the level of shoplifting that level of low labor cost business inevitably produces. They want the customers to do most of the labor of clerks, but they don't want to accept the level of theft that inevitably produces.

load more comments (5 replies)

Yeah, no shit. It's almost like the entire fucking world was telling you this when you embarked on this ridiculous plan.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 57 points 3 days ago (3 children)

When your prices are significantly higher than your competition, you also sell fewer products. Walgreens and CVS are both stupid expensive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Last time I went to cvs (competitor to Walgreens), 3 different things I wanted were locked up. It took me too long to get someone 3 fucking different times to unlock it. On the last one I told the employee next time I’m just going to order online and might not be from cvs. Treat me like a kid or a criminal and I’ll take my business elsewhere

That's horrible and CVS deserves to lose your business, butI promise you that, unless it was the store manager you told, that employee absolutely did not care and didn't tell anyone who did care. That's just a consequence of divorcing ownership of businesses from employment. I swear to you that no normal employee of a national chain has ever been impacted by being told by a customer that they're taking their business elsewhere. If anything people should write letters to corporate, not let a low level employee with no interest in the company know.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The store in my neighborhood thought it wise to lock up the fancy Italian coffee beans. I'm absolutely sure it will not stem theft and will absolutely decrease sales. The bags are big - these are the 1kg bags - so I'm fairly sure most of the theft that is happening is internal anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

I expect lighting, store position, lots of cameras, hidden security tags, diligent security and psychology would minimize losses and maximize the chances of catching people stealing items.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›