this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
347 points (94.8% liked)

politics

19296 readers
2644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden's press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 151 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Stupidity and cowardice. He’s a lame duck; he could’ve gone down swinging and let the next administration take the heat for this. But no, he had to show his true colors.

[–] Irremarkable@fedia.io 104 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This will be his legacy. Opening the door wide open to the wolves and supporting the worst genocide since Rwanda. And he deserves it.

I said it before and it bears repeating: he’ll be remembered as a combination of the worst failures of Neville Chamberlain and Paul von Hindenburg.

That’s it. That’s his legacy. Every other aspect of what he did - positive or negative - pales in comparison.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I think he signed this one because the threat of what is coming is much worse. But I do agree, I wish Biden were a better man than he is.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It really is a shame. His administration did a lot of good stuff and ultimately it's going to be completely overshadowed by his inaction on a few really important issues.

I don't know if he could've prevented the coming disaster, but he sure as fuck could've put us in a better position to weather the storm, and he absolutely did not.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Stupidity and cowardice.

The defining characteristics of the Biden administration and the centrist wing of the Democratic party.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 101 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Biden isn’t the worst president ever, but he’s a piece of shit. He was entirely not up to the task of our time, and that was obvious in 2020. His presidency had more to do with fulfilling an old man’s lifelong desire to sit in the big seat, rather than meet the needs of the citizenry. It was basically a make-a-wish project for establishment Democrats who desire gentlemanly order and aggrandizement more than any meaningful policy goals. This was a group project, and all of the self-interested facilitators that covered up his senility (going back before the 2020 race), are directly culpable in the emerging feudal reign that Republicans are orchestrating, as well as the unjust murders of hundreds of thousands of innocents in Gaza. I started his administration feeling weary but cautiously hopeful that we may have averted calamity. I end his administration having lost confidence in not only our government, but of our people. I could not have more contempt for the entire American project and all the hollow sentiments that cloak the inhumanity of it. Biden is such a clown.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He's literally patting himself for doing the best job he could instead of bowing out sooner.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (37 children)

What a dumb take. If Harris had been in the Presidential seat, she would have lost by more.

Trump's fear mongering and lies are all that got him elected. Plain and simple. Putting ANY candidate up against a sitting president for re-election that just lies and says fascist bullshit non-stop is a sure winner.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 14 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

This is not, in general, true, or else everyone would be doing it. Trump is a right-wing populist who's taking advantage of people's dissatisfaction with the status quo and the Democrats' unwillingness to change it. You need both sides for this equation to make sense.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 66 points 2 weeks ago (41 children)

Further cementing both parties as part and parcel to the problems in America.

One wrecks shop, the other apologizes and "hopes" they don't wreck it more, really really with sugar on top, BLM, 💜💜

I'm not sure what I'm insulted by more, the fascists or the pandering corporate Democrat liars pretending we're all best friends.

Neither speak for our country. We, the workers, the toilers, the sticks that churn this economy should be the ones speaking for it, not these thieves and grifters.

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If only there was some way for him to stop it from happening.... Well, Joe, at least you tried.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

It's not like his own opponent did something like that in the past because he didn't like the text of the bill. Surely not...

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/vetoes/TrumpDJ.htm

[–] cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is the bill in question: H.R 5009

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5009

I implore anyone defending Biden for this as him having to make a "tough decision" to review the roll calls for the votes on this bill.

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1182/vote_118_2_00325.htm

40 Democratic senators voted yes.

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024500

81 Democratic represenatives voted yes.

This anti-trans bill was passed with support from the Democrats. The bourgeoisie political parties of the United States will never protect your human rights, especially when dollars for the military are on the line.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (20 children)

I guess if there was any doubt before, it's gone now. Neither party is suitable. Time to really vote progressive. We need a new party that isn't deeply entrenched with whatever made hime sign that.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Time to do more than voting, comrade. The rule makers will never allow real change within the rules that they create.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Agreed, and what we really need is to actually end the duopoly by changing the voting system to a more fairly representative one like ranked-choice or rated, in the first place. Voting third party will just increase the chance of Republicans winning if that third party is left-leaning, and no third party will get a majority vote if you can't convince the vast majority of Americans to completely change their entire understanding of political parties that they've held on to for the past decades.

Just my opinion here, but the primary thing we should focus on is changing voting systems, because that's what will actually allow us to have a third party be successful in the first place.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

we should swap the pardon power for line item veto

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (33 children)

we should swap the pardon power for line item veto

Yeah. Would be neat watching Democrats make excuses for why only Republicans could use it.

load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm lost. He spoke against it, but signed it anyway. Did they give any rationalization for signing it?

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Paraphrasing here, but "we need to spend money on the military otherwise we won't be safe"

Except that doesn't really hold up since they could have sent it back to be modified and voted on again anyways.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No, not enough time to send it back and the R's knew exactly what they were doing here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What a stupid play. He doesn't benefit from this and it will now be used as a wedge issue by both Parties to rile up their base. Ignorant shortsighted policy. He's only encouraging division.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

God when will people stop falling for this crap, this is exactly the culture war repubs are waging. Half of them don't even give a crap about shitting on LGBTQ+, what they care about is shitting on the Dems so R's can stay in power. They put the poison pill in a bill that Biden has no choice but to sign, JUST TO GET HEADLINES LIKE THIS, so that progressives will blame Biden and the democrats instead of the magats. And you fall for it every time. Sure, sometimes you also blame the R's for actually doing the bad things, but you always blame democrats when they aren't able to stop R's from doing the bad things. You all might hate the military but we kind of need one and if we just shut it down we're leaving ourselves vulnerable. What you are doing by blaming Biden for this is like saying yeah what the rapist did was wrong but she didn't fight him off hard enough, she must have wanted it. smh

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Why didnt the Democrats block this bill and accuse the Republicans of trying to abuse it to pass their bigotry, rather putting millions of people well being on the line?

If you always play the bad game instead of standing up from the table and calling it out, it is because you do like playing the game and you are fine with the consequences.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (20 children)

They put the poison pill in a bill that Biden has no choice but to sign

He could have refused to sign. But that might have violated one of the precious norms that Democrats care more about than trans people.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Well as long as the soldiers get their Christmas bonuses, I suppose a few thousand dead children is an acceptable price to pay. We wouldn't want the soldiers to have their Christmas ruined, and it's not like it would be the Republicans' fault for politicizing a must-pass spending bill. Oh well, it's not like trans kids are really human, a 9/11 worth of child corpses is fine. We wouldn't want to ruin Christmas.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I swear Biden is doing absolutely everything in his power to make his administration and the Democrats look as feckless and duplicitous as possible. All this bluster about saving democracy leading up to the election and he hasn't lifted a finger to protect it since November 6th, but he sure does jump at the chance to abuse his pardon power and sign laws with bonafide conservative horseshit like this in it.

This country is an absolute joke. If this is what we were hoping would stop the tide of fascist ideology, then we're doomed to suffer at the hands of spineless politicians who think compromise with the uncompromising is a winning strategy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

smell that bipartisanship.

[–] macattack@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

"Biden cares about trans people unlike Trump!"

Old bigot white dude is an old bigot, news at 11. At least Trump makes it clear he wants my kind to die in a fire for good ratings on Fox News.

load more comments
view more: next ›