this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
719 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2994 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Hearing more and more stories about companies cutting bonuses this year so they can buy more supplies now at cheaper prices. They know the prices will go up and they'll have to pass the increase to the consumers. But how much you wanna bet these companies will still raise prices even before they have to pay their tariff increases? They're gonna get extra money on the supplies they paid the lower prices on.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

...This is just normal basic business economics.

Your retail price is not predicated on what you paid to produce or obtain the product, it's based on what you expect to have to pay to produce or procure the next one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (9 children)

Yeah, I mean I knew that, you knew that, Americans are so uneducated that the majority had no idea how basic economics work.

Well FAFO, we're all going to learn the hard way I guess.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

And fuck those of us who already knew the lesson. Its like school but without getting to go home at the end of the day. And just like school, the kids who need it probably wont pay attention

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 83 points 18 hours ago (10 children)

But the question is, will American manufacturing make up for the costs? Or, will American manufacturing just raise their prices to match the tariffs and lump the profits into their executive bonuses. They deserve it after all for being smart enough to raise prices.

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 42 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

American manufacturing CAN'T, it would take years, decades honestly, to get back the capacity to make all the crap we've outsourced to other countries.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 44 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

And this is the absolute brain rot fantasy of tariffs that I keep explaining to these idiots, and keep getting blank stares or awkward silences.

Tariffs are 100% punitive, without a domestic/alternative sourcing strategy. They can work long term to reduce a foreign nation's competitive advantage in an industry while allowing a domestic industry space to exist, but that only works if there’s a domestic industry that already exists (at enough scale to meet demand) or a long term government program to nurture and build those industries - education/vocation training, regulatory concerns, infrastructure development, raw materials availability, etc

Tariffs Chinese steel/electronics/machine tools/etc into oblivion? Either buy the imported at a high price, or buy the domestic at a slightly less high price - but the cost is always carried by the consumer no matter what.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 13 points 15 hours ago

And then there's the ensuing trade war that always happens, with the countries retaliating with their own tariffs to the US. Tariffs are a lose-lose scenario, just like they were in 2019.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And they want to kill the CHIPS act, which was going to build some of that local supply.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 13 hours ago

IMO that’s the height of economic policy stupidity because if/when Taiwan gets invaded, China will own nearly all semiconductor manufacturing outside of the highest end fab houses such as Intel or GlobalFoundries. The future of domestic manufacturing is high tech or specialty like Corning glassworks or L3-Harris, even car manufacturers get beat out by imports with our current tariff structure

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dgmib@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

During his first term Trump put a tariffs on Washing Machines. The price of imported washing machines went up. The price of domestically manufactured washing machines was also raised. Even the price of dryers — which didn’t have a tariff — went up on both imported and domestically manufactured appliances.

I have yet to see an economist that thinks Trumps tariff plans will benefit the working class.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] coriza@lemmy.world 34 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If some other countries are any indication, not only will they raise the prices but they will raise it way more than the tariffs and just blame on tariffs and with time people will just think that is the way it is. "X cost 3 times as other countries? That is because the tariffs" no mind that the tariffs is like 50% and not 300%. Like they already do with gas prices. Gas go up immediately when oil prices rise but only goes down, if ever, for new stock.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago

That is exactly what US steel did in response to the steel tariffs back in Trump round one.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (12 children)

Realistically though, that's how tariffs just work. With products costing more, theoretically that should drive demand down and eventually lead to fewer imports. Of course, if there's still no competing product or the product is a basic necessity, then it'll likely just result in people paying more.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Yes. We will pay for the tariffs.

American companies will pay for the tariffs, and then we the consumers who buy their products will pay for the tariffs via price increases.

This is money that we will invest. It is a tax. It is the government causing us to spend more money.

It is not a usual tax in the sense of money paid to the IRS. But it is an economic cost that we will pay in order to support a government policy.

The cost is paid to enact a certain outcome. The outcome is less importing of goods, and more of those goods being provided by sources within our borders. It will cost money to make this change. That cost will be paid by us.

We are being forced to pay money to enact a policy. That’s how it’s essentially a tax.

Except this policy is basically:

  • More stuff that American consumers consume, will come from American companies
  • There will be more manufacturing capability to meet this demand
  • There will be more demand for American labor, improving the lives of American workers
  • We will be more militarily capable due to being able to build more things in-house

That is a set of changes being targeted by this policy. We will pay for this policy by paying higher prices. The intention, the hope, is that the policy will pay for itself in terms of the third bullet point: more manufacturing in America means more jobs for Americans. More demand for American stuff means better bargaining position for American workers, means more income.

In the short term it’ll suck. Just like any other heavy tax can suck in the short term, before the benefits can manifest and make it worth it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Mango Mussolini's tariff plans will increase prices across the board. The corporations earned record profits during the so-called inflation and the US consumers that voted for Cheeto are fucking clueless about the inbound out of control freight train.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh well don't worry the out of control freight trains mostly poison trump voters in ohio and the water supply of all the red states.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 36 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Everything he will do contributes to anger, division and the collapse of the United States.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 17 hours ago

People will be angry but angry at the wrong people. No, let's not be angry at the guy for actively destroying everyone's lives. Let's be angry at blacks. Or gay people. Or transgenders. Or police. Or scientists.

Fucking dumb Americans.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

I was promised cheaper eggs.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (11 children)

Cool. Places like Aldis will continue not-fucking their customers while walmart will continue doing the same shit it always has, fucking over poor people and small business owners.

Dont shop at walmart if you can help it. Or kroger. Or any other shitty american company thats profit driven.

Cool trick y'all can do: if profit is the clear main goal, that company is garbage no matter what they do.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›