this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
39 points (95.3% liked)

Europe

1564 readers
283 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine’s air force has said Russia fired an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at the city of Dnipro, which if confirmed would be the first time the long-range weapon has been used in any armed conflict.

The claim was not immediately accepted by others, however. ABC News reported, citing western officials, that this was an exaggeration and that the weapon was in fact a shorter-range ballistic missile, similar to the types used repeatedly by Russia against Ukraine during the war.

Update: President [ Putin] says hypersonic missile (Oreshnik) fired at Dnipro military site in reply to Kyiv’s strikes in Russia with western missiles

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] b000rg@midwest.social 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

But why? Aren't ICBMs incredibly expensive? Like, rocket ship expensive because that's basically what they are? Aren't there other hypersonic options that are cheaper and less politically loaded?

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

They are. It's a message, and rather expensive at that. For all intents and purposes, most notably to early warning systems, it was a nuke. Crazy Vlad over here flung one without a payload and triggered full on DEFCON 2 or even 1 just to make a point.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Maybe the propellant goes bad after a couple decades so you might as well? Idk

Or they need to test fire and train people anyways

[–] IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If confirmed, firing of weapon would mark first time missile – which can carry nuclear payload – has been used

is the guardian too cheap for proofreading now??

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago

Also this assessment is wrong. Russian cruise missiles are perfectly capable of carrying nukes and they are fired daily in dozens πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ But perhaps they are nitpicking...

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 3 points 3 days ago

There's a reason it is nicknamed the Grauniad

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't the ICBM launch trip US nuclear defenses? Or is it only flocks of birds?

[–] refalo@programming.dev 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes which is why other countries were notified first so they didn't retaliate automatically. A lot more discussion goes on behind closed doors than most people realize.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

"But Scholz!"

[–] sirico 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There's literally 2 clear videos of it, whats the claim?

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Apperantly, and I'm no expert, after checking various sources, the exact missile type hasn't been confirmed yet, independentally. There seems to be a discussion of two options afaik; a proper ICBM; or another version, sort of it's little brother, which is more of a shorter range missile.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org -2 points 3 days ago

Manufacturing consent from a UK newspaper. That's unheard of.