this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
185 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

There's no such thing as the Palestinians

These jerks have been saying this kind of thing for decades.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 150 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Good job everyone who sat out or voted 3rd party this election. You saved Palestine!

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I dont think those protest voters were significant, people just think "food didnt get cheaper" and didnt felt like voting anymore. Thats your average voter mindset.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's funny how they consider they had massive impact until there are consequences to their actions. Then, it wasn't much.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone sincerely believed that protest voters were ever going to have a significant impact. I think all of the noise you heard was astroturf designed to knock Harris from both sides of the Israel political position.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago

At most it cost her Michigan. There were deeper issues with the campaign.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The jump in searches for "who is running for president" the day of the election tells you all you need to know about the average American voter.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My heart sank when I read about this. How?! Were these people in a coma for the last few months?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FarFarAway@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kilometers_OBrien@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks BIDEN (you know, the current POTUS).

[–] FarFarAway@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago

Yet, after the election.

But, yes, it happened under Biden's presidency, Biden should get the credit.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While ignoring that for most people, their purchasing power also went up.

They want to pay pre-pandemic prices for food while making post-pandemic paychecks, and there's no way that's going to happen without guillotines. So instead they voted in the wealthy assholes who directly caused COVID and indirectly caused inflation/greedflation because surely those people won't do that again, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] simplymath@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 32 points 1 week ago (46 children)

Do you really think he changed his stance since then?

He's also the new US ambassador to Israel. That's from 2 hours ago.

load more comments (46 replies)
[–] krelvar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm sure he's a kinder, gentler Huckabee nowadays.

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Joe Biden is still president and over 200 children were slaughtered since the election. Tomorrow is the deadline he gave Israel for letting aid into the north of Gaza, but he will not enforce it because he also believes that there are no such thing as Palestinians and that they should die, leave or live as subjects to Jews so that Israel can annex all territory the Bible grants it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

Your new Ambassador to Isreal.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

Middle to Low Income Americans: fucked

Palestinians: eradicated

Separation of Church and State: homogenized

1%ers: completely torqued

The NWO is here, the Rubes just forgot to mention it was them and the capitalists enacting it not the illuminati

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All the ghouls crawling back out from under rocks

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They weren't hiding, they just stopped screaming long enough to get a good breath of air for the next scream.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Crawling back out from the February 24, 2015 rock.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Based on the need for ancient history to claim a people, there's no Americans either. Does that mean we give everything back to the indigenous people? I hope so. Also even if they're Arabs as you say, that doesn't mean you can just murder them indiscriminately like this.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, an American politician should be wary of making the argument that non-ancient roots in an area make their claim on their land default.

Honestly, I have trouble dealing with the irony that American politicians are pro-zionism becuase Jews used to hold the land a long time ago until they were outcast from their homelands aand forced to move far away, displacing Palestinian people that live tthere now in the process.... and then think that Native American sovereignty (let alone their claim to their historical lands that were stolen from them) are ridiculous and unfair to contemporary US citizens that live here now.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No it's okay we have nukes.

I'm trying to be satirical but I can't really think of another argument

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, because Israel definitely doesn't have nukes. That would be in violation of international non-proliferation agreements, and they have the utmost respect for international law.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

No one respects international law like Uncle Sam and his buddies!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

This guy is about to become Ambassador to Israel btw

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is from 2015, just, y'know.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sure he's changed his mind on the subject since then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh.

Got any updates from Mike Huckabee for us that show a change in stance?

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Article from 2015

Not that his opinions have likely changed, but please tell people if you're sharing older news articles.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not that his opinions have likely changed

Exactly

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

No such thing as a Huckabee either.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Oh shit, that’s the first person I ever voted against! As a 17 year old I registered as a republican specifically because I hated him.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"And to the left, we have the consequences of our actions."

load more comments
view more: next ›