this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
741 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CumWeedPoop@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

As a dude that hasn't been in a relationship in years and never been in a serious relationship, I 100% support this. I am ashamed to be a gen Z male. Everyone who voted for Trump is going to get exactly what they voted for. Even if you don't care about weed or abortion Trump's tariffs are going to cause calamity of biblical proportion. Maybe your rich friends with high end corporate jobs will get a bonus though.

I hope men suffer from being barred from sex and dating, and not just the low quality losers like me.

At least we "owned the libs" all right by voting for morons who will rob us of what freedoms we have left and then cause the second great depression though. I hope it was worth it.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

From your comment I can tell you're definitely not a "low quality loser".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bold of them to imagine they’ll keep the right to withhold consent in the new regime.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Most the women who voted for Trump don't know marital rape is a thing. Probably never even heard those two words in the same sentence.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

ok so. I like the concept, it's a good way to move.

HOWEVER there is one big problem. We can't use this emotionally inflammatory rhetoric, because it's what the right thrives on. You can quote me on this later, but i guarantee you if the right sees this they will call it "sexual eugenics" or something stupid.

literally all you have to do to make this a fully marketable and unbeatable position is to treat it like econ 101. Social interaction is most often based on simple contractual obligations. Those in question here, have failed, and thus, it is no longer contractually valid.

"the market for sex is simply untenable culturally, and in terms of healthcare, completely fucked. I no longer plan on having casual sex anytime soon" and suddenly it's like 50x more reasonable and palatable than the previous statement.

and before anybody tells me "oh well it's good for attention and marketing" yeah, if you want to spread the entirely wrong message. just look at the bear vs man debacle that happened a while ago.

~~although you have to be careful because the right will probably just tell you that this is the point, at least the religious part of it, in which case being inflammatory isn't going to do shit anyway. Tough times we live in now, i guess.~~

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›