this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
126 points (92.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2089 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 61 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If our side wins, Elon, you will experience severe economic pain. It will be a necessary temporary hardship.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not even, you could literally take 90% of Elon Musk's money and it wouldn't really hurt any more than it hurts to see one's score in a video game go down. He'd still be among the richest people on the planet.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

I know, I was just pointing out how, with the wealth he has, economic hardship just doesn't really happen for him in the same way it does for everyone else

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"I mean, Elon Musk joked to me, and he has, I think, many times, that he's going to go to prison if Trump loses," Carlson said.

Elon, what have you been up to?! No wonder you're so fired up for Trump to win. Does this have anything to do with all those phone calls to Putin these past couple years? The ones that started around the time the Putin invaded Ukraine and you got put on the hook to buy Twitter?

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Just some light treason.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Don't threaten me with a good time!

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

Pinky promise?

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago

If Elon and Trump go to jail in 2025-2026 I will be the happiest person in the fucking world.

If Tesla collapses and the Tesla that I own becomes worthless I won't even care. Fuck Tesla and fuck Elon and fuck anyone Elon and Trump associate with.

We need to burn them all to the ground.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

Not seeing a downside here...

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wednesday you'll see Elon The Edgelord wearing that 'Dont Bully Me I'll Cum' shirt.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Elon is such a troll. I want to make it clear, I am not bullying Elon, because.. well you know.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

I am! Piss baby South African needs to fall into depression and make sweet love to a running woodchipper.

[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Warns is the wrong word. Teases maybe? Entices? Titillates?

[–] midnight_puker@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 weeks ago

Good news, everyone!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

I don't see any downside with that.

Oh no... won't anybody think of the poor billionares??

[–] dlove67@feddit.nl 20 points 2 weeks ago

"Warns" is usually used when it's a bad thing.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago

"Please, stop! I can only get so erect!"

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 18 points 2 weeks ago

A) That's false.

B) Even if it was true, I fail to see the downside.

[–] roy_mustang76@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago

As he honestly should. Dude's too high on his own supply.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's okay.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

He is destroying himself. The law will continue to serve its function.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'd pay to watch Kamala swath herself in a U.S. Flag and Homelander Musk straight to oblivion.

[–] Lydia_K@startrek.website 8 points 2 weeks ago

Kamala should have run on this platform.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

oh no the tragedy! I would only be sorry for SpaceX

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Naw just the less serious 4 legged alarm clock demon scratches

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

And abortion hurricanes

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Don't threaten me with a good time!