this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
77 points (96.4% liked)

PC Gaming

8607 readers
782 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In our efforts to combat cheating in Apex, we’ve identified Linux OS as being a path for a variety of impactful exploits and cheats. As a result, we’ve decided to block Linux OS access to the game.

Translation: Software development is hard and we would rather spend our time maximizing in-game transactions.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Looks like they use Easy Anti Cheat services which run at the kernel level on windows but not on Linux, that leaves a huge loophole available for Linux which I actually believe will increase cheating dramatically.

As for the software development, that’s on EAC to fix. And in fairness it doesn’t make sense for them financially to do so. Cheating already costs these companies a ton of money to fix as is.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, time for some review bombing?

[–] Draconic_NEO@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't own the game but I would if I did. I don't have a windows machine to Idle it on that wouldn't be bogged down by this game so idling it to rack up a few hours to leave a review isn't exactly feasible.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't you just buy it, write a review, return it?

[–] Draconic_NEO@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I guess I could but I'd still need to add playtime since steam doesn't let you review with 0 playtime.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

That’s ok, I took away my support for Apex Legends many seasons ago!

Their anti cheat has always been a joke anyway.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What the fuck does kernel level cheat detection do when you can just have a robot arm move the mouse based on what a camera sees when it's pointed at the screen.

https://youtu.be/LkmIItTrQP4?si=88cmGiQgxZH-D9vs

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Ease of access.

[–] Draconic_NEO@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Or Monitors which use AI to spot players, something which could be considered cheating but can't be detected other than being "too good" something that'll have a shit ton of false positives and can be defeated by losing occasionally.

[–] ganoo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Luckily all my friends and I stopped playing this a while ago, there are so many better options nowadays.

[–] twinnie -3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

To be fair, they’ve given a relatively technical and honest explanation as to why they’ve made this decision.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 21 points 3 weeks ago

No they really haven't. They've given no numbers to quantify the problem.

This reads like "we don't know if they are cheating, it's hard to tell, and it's getting harder to tell, so we're just done."

This reeks of a decision based on a feeling about the direction of cheating vs a significant move to reduce cheating.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Sure how many people play on Linux vs windows? How many cheaters are on windows vs Linux? A assure you the windows number is way higher then Linux on both.