this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1196 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2307 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

XKCD: Todays 10000 is just as relevant for this topic as it is for mentos and diet pop.

we should not stop bringing this up until it isnt relevant anymore. Which isnt going to be in my life time, likely, so you people everywhere who are either just reaching a point in your life where this IS news to you, or you have people in your circles that havent got the message yet, this seems like a good report to reference.

It's not enough to know or believe a thing.

It's being able to get that info the heads of people who don't know or haven't accepted it yet, by hook or crook, that we must be diligent for and this article, helps us do that.

Don't be only be bitter and cynical, if you are, also be part of the needed majority of people who will champion the bed to take down this flawed policy. Even if you only carry the torch to pass on to those that come after us.

It's s fight with fighting. Spread the knowledge don't make people feel bad for not already knowing this or believing it. Maybe this is the straw that breaks the supply side camels back

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

How about now?

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I have two words: Fuck Reagan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Structure7528@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Who would have thunk?

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

In the same way that a Ponzi scheme failed to pay its bagholders. It's by design.

[–] joel1974@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

There had to be a study?

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago

One year of printing new dollars and forcibly closing small businesses has failed to make things cheaper, new study shows.

[–] Mikey_donuts@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

Water is wet etc etc

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

pretty sure he knew that from the start. the repuglican payola corruption goes way way back

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I remember Ross Perot talking about the lack of trickle-down back in the 90s, but he was old, had funny big ears, showed a lot of confusing charts and was a billionaire, so why listen to him.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Also: water is wet

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I will never get why it is the most well off of us that they give the tax cuts too. I mean, other than bribery of course. Even if it did work, how long were they supposed to wait? "I know little Timmy needs braces, and you can't afford to feed them them, but just wait a little longer! Musk is almost done with dicking around with the election. I'm sure it'll trickle down then!"

[–] Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Oh, there's been some trickle down, it's just not anything having to do with money, it's been more of a golden shower that's been trickling down.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

I am Jacks complete and utter disbelief. I lead him to depression, and he dies of malnutrition and liver failure.

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What's outrageous is that this is being treated as news, when it's not new, e.g. (from 2021) https://www.thebalancemoney.com/trickle-down-economics-theory-effect-does-it-work-3305572

We've known this that since at least 2001, if not earlier, https://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2001/09/the-trickle-down-economics-straw-man/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›