this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Retro Gaming

1 readers
32 users here now

A magazine about old school video games

Rules

Don't be a jerk Top level threads must be about old video games

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Review for Space Station Silicon Valley
on Nintendo 64 from 64 Magazine 20 - December 1998 (UK)

This magazine can be downloaded here:
https://www.outofprintarchive.com/catalogue/64Magazine.html

#retrogaming
#Nintendo
#N64

Review for Space Station Silicon Valley on Nintendo 64 from 64 Magazine 20 - December 1998 (UK)  score: 87%
Review for Space Station Silicon Valley on Nintendo 64 from 64 Magazine 20 - December 1998 (UK)  score: 87%
Review for Space Station Silicon Valley on Nintendo 64 from 64 Magazine 20 - December 1998 (UK)  score: 87%

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jeltron@pocketpixels.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games Is the percentage totally independent of the X/5 scores above it? It looks like they add up to the score but 3+3+5+4=15 and 15x5=75

[–] OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@Jeltron@pocketpixels.club
I have no idea.
Some do this while others don’t.
I’m not a fan of doing so as I’m of the belief that a game is more than the sum of its parts so making it a simply calculation just feels wrong to me.

[–] Jeltron@pocketpixels.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games I also really think game devs that think of their game as a sum of its parts make much worse games than those who have a vision of the project as a whole.

[–] OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@Jeltron@pocketpixels.club
My mind immediately went to modern day Ubisoft. 👀

[–] Jeltron@pocketpixels.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games It seems like there is some sort of 'gameplay formula' that they use, doesn't it? I know a lot of the artists are incredible there though.

[–] OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games 1 points 1 month ago

@Jeltron@pocketpixels.club
It’s all very formulaic.
But I do get the impression that it’s all due to upper management making development more like factory work over there.
Bullet points that must be followed at all cost to be able to put them into a PR release.
There’s a ton of talent there, as well as a lot of talent that has left over the past couple of years.

They deserve so much better.

[–] Jeltron@pocketpixels.club 1 points 1 month ago

@OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games I completely agree. Some of the best games of all time would lose a lot of points in a category or two but when viewed as a whole deserve a perfect score while some mediocre games are technically good in a lot of categories.

[–] ishambard@cupoftea.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games

This god damn game 😂
I never finished this one, and it is on the list.

I remember that it had lots of really obtuse collectibles, which are sometimes alluded to, and other times they are not.

Like in the first stage, if you use the crashed rocket's engines to incinerate a sheep corpse, you get a special thing. I only knew about that because it was in a magazine.

Definitely have mixed feelings about going back to that one when I get a chance 😂

[–] OutofPrintArchive@mstdn.games 1 points 1 month ago

@ishambard@cupoftea.social
I never played this one.
I love hidden stuff like that. But I can see how it might become infuriating when trying to 100% it. 😂

[–] brognak@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

My sister and I were OBSESSED with this game when we were kids. Need to go back and replay it.