this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
300 points (97.8% liked)

Android

17724 readers
16 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So if I'm reading this correctly, this is only a change in One UI, which Samsung makes, and only affects their devices... So why is Google being sued other than for headlines?

Also, it's still not blocked, just additional warnings educating users about security, or lack thereof with side loading.

Not really on Epic's side here honestly.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You're talking about the same Epic that intentionally broke TOS, threw a tantrum when it was correctly kicked off the store, responded with a prepared 80-page lawsuit a day later, lost on all but one count, and is now strutting around pretending it was all for the players while taking their money by the fistful.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Apples TOS is complete bullshit and I support anyone that breaks it.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Wow, what a freedom fighter.

Apple's (and Google&Co's) walled garden policies are absolute bullshit and should be outlawed, but in this, Epic is in the wrong. They agreed to a contract, they didn't like it, so they chose to break it. Besides, saying that you "support something" does fuck all. Go and do something. Call a politician and get the law changed, you rebel.

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

To be fair, calling a politician will do fuck all to change a law, unless you have a giant bag of money, which Google and apple have.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They agreed to a contract, they didn't like it, so they chose to break it.

What was the contract?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The relevant part in simple terms: if an app is distributed on the App Store, all in-app purchases must be made through the App Store (so Apple can have their 30%), the app can't bypass this, and the app can't contain links/buttons/calls to action to have the user bypass it. Epic implemented their own independent in-app purchase solution that violated this, and they got kicked out.

Whether or not the 30% cut is fair is not relevant to the topic. I think it's a baseless amount, and Apple's walled garden is clearly anti-competitive and anti-consumer. The point is that Epic's violation of the TOS was a premeditated action in order to inject their fake "for the players" narrative into their litigations and rally the Fortnite-addicted kids who didn't know better. They had an 80-page lawsuit and a pissing CGI short film ready on the day. Apple wants all of the money, Epic wants all of the money, and they're not above using every dirty trick they know.

Obligatory IANAL, and this is old info, TOS may have changed. Hoeg Law on Youtube specializes in video games, it probably has a more in-depth and up-to-date analysis of the situation.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Specifically because Apple is engaging in anti competitive and anti consumer practices (your words) I have a very difficult time seeing this action as "dirty." Companies will do what companies do and pursue money, but if their pursuit of money coincidentally happens to fight for consumer rights then I don't think we should say it's dirty.

Sort of like "if you don't have your own, store bought is fine" lol

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They didn't have to play. That's the point. They didn't have to agree to the contract. But since they did agree (and then intentionally broke the contract), they're wrong too. They can't be absolved of their part in this because the other party also did wrong. This is a two wrongs don't make a right situation.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not saying they shouldn't face consequences, I'm saying we shouldn't view it as a dirty trick.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This I actually agree with except that they tried to use their users as a cudgel against the company they tried to defraud.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Besides, saying that you "support something" does fuck all.

So what? Am I not allowed to express my opinion because of that?

Also, my politicians have already started to outlaw these practices. There is obviously still much work to be done but it's happening.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Fuck you and everything you stand for.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They broke TOS in order to serve the letter. You can’t sue for something that doesn’t affect you. Saying they threw a tantrum is disgraceful

And they should have won the Apple suit but Apple was deemed to not have a large enough market share to have a monopoly…even if they have a monopoly on Apple products

It was terrible news for consumers

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Eh a lot of TOS bullshit is exactly that. And Apple is very far from perfect, especially with anything that could even think of threatening their walled garden. I assume everything Apple does is bad for the consumer, because 99% of the time that's accurate.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How about all app stores (including Play Store and Samung own app store) not installed as system apps and show warnings equally when user install something new?

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine a case similar to what we had about the default web browser on Windows.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Stop, I've got insomnia and don't wanna get too excited 🀀

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you can get this on something like graphene os. You can choose to install google play, or not to. and use any other app store like android and they all have the same permissions.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ain't google play assumes it always installed as system app and graphene os team had to build a sandbox around it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate it, my shitty xiaomi gives me a 10 second cooldown before letting me install one 😀

[–] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unrelated but, amazing pfp mate.

Tux do the speen haha, he so silly

[–] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ay thx 😎

[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

It's cool the first couple times but I wish there was a lemmy setting to disable it

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago

Was curious of what the step is and found this video for Samsung https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6TMvBQ7Sm0

And for Google Pixel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD9nsSmDG_8

Doesn't seem too different from the old enable unknown apps aside from Samsung requiring an additional step. Unless third party apps get completely blocked having to enable it doesn't seem like a bad thing with how clueless lot of people are about apks and risks associated with them if they didn't get it from a safe source.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When did this become a thing? I sideload apps all the time with no issues.

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Afaik new feature in android 15

Edit: Nvm, just read the article, apparently a feature in latest OneUI. So unless you use Samsung you wouldn't know it. That aside, with android 15 you will get some sort of "feature" which discourages sideloading.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well my Z Fold 3 stopped updating after Android 14, so I guess I need to make this phone last as long as humanly possible cause this is bullshit.

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Lol same thought. I just got a new phone which came with Android 14 and I'm not updating this device.

[–] IndomitableAlbus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Samsung user.

Spotted the inclusion of Auto Blocker in the last system update.

The App can be disabled, or as I did, adb uninstalled.

honestly I think the complaint about there being no way for other app stores to become "authorized sources" is valid