this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

UK Energy

199 readers
3 users here now

A place to post links and discussions around the UK's energy production, National Grid, energy consumption, and green energy news.

See https://grid.iamkate.com/ for the UK's current energy production and sources.

Created 23/07/23

Subscriber Count

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ofgem said: “By raising the EBIT allowance, Ofgem is taking the next step in its drive to make the retail energy sector more resilient, as we move into another difficult winter when price volatility remains a risk.

“At the height of the energy crisis around 30 suppliers failed because they did not have enough capital in the reserve to stay in business – and the cost was shared among all energy consumers, adding £83 to bills.

“With suppliers only now starting to recoup a portion of their multi-billion pound losses over the past four years, a small increase in permitted profit margins will allow companies to better cover their costs, attract investment and retain financial stability protecting consumers into the future.”

...

Simon Francis, coordinator of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, commented on the matter, expressing his concerns.

Mr Francis said: “When you look at the details of this price cap, the reality is that every unit of energy a customer uses costs double what it did a few years ago. The daily standing charges customers pay have also increased – doubling in the case of electricity.

“The Energy Bills Support Scheme has also been taken away this winter, while energy firms have been allowed to increase the profits they make per customer and vulnerable households have been left wondering what will happen this winter and beyond.

“Ministers had promised to consult on tariff reform to help the households most in need and who most rely on energy to keep themselves safe. Sadly, they have abandoned plans for a social tariff consultation.

“The government seems to be running out of enthusiasm to help people get through the energy bills crisis, and it is also now running out of time to act to keep people warm this winter.”

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mex 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they havn't set minimum reservers then they will just pay themselves all the extra profit and still collapse.

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. I think we have to face facts that regulatory capture in the UK is complete. OFWAT do fuck all to regulate water suppliers, OFGEM do fuck all to regulate energy suppliers. They're claiming that increasing permitted profit margin will avoid the problems we had last year with suppliers going bust, when in fact that was because they were trying to play the game of short-term energy trading instead of hedging properly.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OFGEM do fuck all to regulate energy suppliers.

They regulate the market in favour of the energy providers not the consumers.

[–] Emperor 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they are doing their job well, it's just we were foolish to think they worked for us.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Working as intended. Much like any "self regulated industry"

[–] mannycalavera 2 points 1 year ago

So how does this work?

OFGEM wants a competitive market with many competing (and often smaller) energy suppliers. However they saw that last time around these would operate on tiny tiny margins that weren't resilient to wider shocks in the energy market. So they failed on a massive scale and effectively everyone had to pick up the slack hence the adding £83 to bills bit. The answer as they see it is to allow them to operate on larger margins so they can become resilient over time? If they still fail they fail but they should have the requisite reserves such that the whole market doesn't take a hit as a consequence of one supplier failing? Is that about it? Basically?

Sounds similar to the aftermath of the banking crisis in 2008. They operated on risky faulty assumptions with little margins that weren't resilient to a huge shock. As a result we had to bail them all out. What happened on the intervening years is that that market has been told to build up massive reserves to be resilient to another shock. Banks and building societies and asset management companies go through stress testing each year and effectively wargame these scenarios. Quite often the FCA tell them to up their reserves. If OFGEM does the same I can kinda see the logic to this and don't actually mind. It stands to reason that to be resilient you need to invest. That has to come from somewhere right?

But is that too narrow a reading? What do others think? The article is fairly light on details.