this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
893 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

58138 readers
5546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

yt-dlp remains unaffected for now.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 day ago

yt-dlp is only affected when YT changes their algorithms (breaking yt-dlp data scrapping capabilities) or when it's used frequently with the same IP address (leading to automatic IP blockage). If you're using yt-dlp sporadically, it shouldn't be affected.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is there a gui interface for that anywhere? I really can’t be bothered to learn the command line just to download a couple vids here and there. Especially when freetube still works for now. But if the barrier to entry was a little lower, I’d start backing up faves.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This looks promising, thanks

[–] PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

There was a linux version but it seems to have gone poof. For Windows users there's : https://yt-bat.github.io/

[–] gentooer@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The basic command is just yt-dlp 'www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ' tho.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That will get me a minimum 1080p vid with sound? Cuz looking at the instructions, it looks a lot more complicated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Seal for Android is a solid client

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder if these services are on small cloud providers. If so then they can just block their entire CIDR.

I wonder if they were to move to GPC if they would have better luck.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound like it's an incredibly difficult problem to solve from a technical standpoint, if the creator is the one being hit. Just need either a software package -- or, if the limitation here is content creator bandwidth, service -- that pushes a video to multiple streaming video providers.

Might be an issue for third-parties creating mirrors of YouTube content, though.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Yep thats whats happening here by the sound of it. TILVids is a very small instance that shares donated $$ with their creators. Its a very good way to try and keep creators on the platform.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 18 points 2 days ago

This can be problematic for Peertube's adoption.

If user only uses Peertube to upload, they likely wouldn't notice a thing from this, but if it's a creator from Youtube that's trying to upload to multiple platforms this can cause major problems for ease of use and since the Peertube user base is small to begin with, this can potentially damage Peertube in the long run.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I've noticed a few people on Reddit taking about getting possibly shadow banned on YouTube, myself included. With no real explanation why? Every video just comes up as "content not available" when logged in. It started a week ago or so. I wonder if this is all related?

[–] anticurrent@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

I took full advantage of invidious while it was still working, now I am anxious of ever going back to YouTube. It won't be long before they requiring giving them your iris scan before watching a video on that shit platform.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Hmm. Per Facebook v. Power Ventures, it could be a (criminal) violation of the CFAA to "circumvent" IP blocks.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›