this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
72 points (84.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers
439 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Naura@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Japan would probably still be isolated.

in 1853 US sent warships to force Japan to trade with the west.

Its imperial aspirations were fueled by western thought.

[โ€“] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Germany would have taken over Europe.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] Tyfud@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The issue comes down to imperialism imo.

Western societies have an imperialist belief that we should be at the head of the table when it comes to the world order, politics, and having a say about what happens outside of our borders.

This is ingrained in all of us from a very young age by design. They've been doing it for millennia, and it's been working pretty well, so no need to change tactics.

It's also why non-western nation-states aren't as involved directly in the politics of other nations. It's not really a part of their ethos as a culture.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ