this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
524 points (91.3% liked)

Firefox

17952 readers
188 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PSA (?): just got this popup in Firefox when i was on an amazon product page. looked into it a bit because it seemed weird and it turns out if you click the big "yes, try it" button, you agree to mandatory binding arbitration with Fakespot and you waive your right to bring a class action lawsuit against them. this is awesome thank you so much mozilla very cool

https://queer.party/@m04/112872517189786676

So, Mozilla adds an AI review features for products you view using Firefox. Other than being very useless, it's T&C are as anti-consumer as it possibly can be. It's like mozilla saying directly "we don't care about your privacy".

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Why do you think it's useless?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Oh they're finally integrating fake spot? That's awesome, actually! Pretty cool plugin, that!

[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sure, Mozilla customer representative #37.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 11 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I'm not opposed to the tool itself but they can fuck off with pushing it onto us. If I want to see the newest Firefox features I'll go the main site and find them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

IANAL, but I don't think T&Cs are really legally binding and can be easily fought against in court.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

While true, it requires time and money to get a case before the court. Which most people don't have. If your rights require you to invest your time and money against a much larger adversarial party in court, then it's not your rights that are being protected in the first place. Right now Big Tech is more worried about us exercising our rights instead of being afraid of trampling on them in the first place.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I know ... But people actually literally want this.

Maybe FF is what we install for normies while we use forks for other flavours.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But people actually literally want this.

No-one except advertisers want this.

Most people simply do not care at all.

[–] Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why do advertisers want you to have tools that help you detect covert advertising?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

How does "waiving your right to a lawsuit" hidden in a terms and conditions apply? I bet it doesn't

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm starting to worry about Mozilla. Firefox is still the best browser, and I've used it for many years... but there are more and more anti-features popping up that require a few settings to be changed. No one thing is a big deal, but I'm starting to feel the same way about Firefox as I did about Windows before I stopped using it: like it's just trying to trick me into doing something I don't want to do rather than aiming to be a good product.

I'm thinking specifically about the address bar getting 'search suggestions' from Google by default; and the special 'ad effectiveness tracking' that is turned on by default to help Facebook. Privacy should always be the default setting. We shouldn't have to keep up-to-date with the latest features and settings just so that we know what to disable!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kehet@suppo.fi 6 points 4 months ago

Back to surf it seems

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›