this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
548 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19150 readers
2164 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You know, 18-24 year olds are the least likely to vote.

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL things unholy, prove me wrong…

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 93 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And young people wonder why no one listens to them. Get mad. Call your elected officials about things that you care about. Volunteer for someone you like. Donate if you can. Commenting online is not doing anything.

Oh yeah... fucking vote.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago (5 children)

That's the thing. Politicians do have access to lists who are registered to vote and who voted and in which election.

If your base doesn't vote, they will adjust their program to those who will. Old people get their way, because they ALWAYS vote.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but that's also total bullshit. Elected officials don't give a shit whether you're young or old, politically inclined or not, foreign or domestic, it only matters if you have money.

These are all good suggestions, and the best way to fight the power. But don't expect to make politicians care. The goal is to make enough noise and demand your rights, because the powerful will only concede ground when it becomes unprofitable to fight you.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They need votes to win first, and if there are voters that would block their victory they would have to accommodate them too.

As for bribes that's another issue and we need to keep their feet to fire and not allow

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

The vast majority of voters are not that dialed in to politics. They vote for names they recognize, or the name next to the D or R that they support. Name recognition is a commodity you can buy with money. If you asked a candidate whether they would rather have a billionaire donor or 10,000 volunteers, guarantee they would all pick the billionaire.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean if you are voting at 18 you are likely going to be a pretty regular voter. At least it was that way with me. Man I still remember this bs election where they moved the polling place and I ended up working late and did not know about it. Was so angry. I so much like mail in. That and wfh are the only bright spots of nowadays.

Its funny, they moved my primary location to a different location than my general both the years Sanders was running. Managed to make it both times but that hasn't happend before or since.

[–] rekorse@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think that group is also the least likely to answer a poll.

Could be the sleeper we need.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If you read the source of your link https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/technical-documentation/methodology.html You would know the census gets that data by polling......

[–] rekorse@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Its also 8 years old data. We've had a lot change in elections and polling and social media etc.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This post didn’t have to be ageist. But it is.

Fun fact, gen z turned up more to vote than any other generation before them- when that generation was the same age, and millennials kinda started that trend.

So you can get off your soap box and stop laying the groundwork for blaming us for yet another thing.

[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago (12 children)

It's not ageist to say that young people do not vote at the rates of older people. It's just a fact.

Good for us for voting in record numbers. They're still poor numbers.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You know, 18-24 year olds are the least likely to vote.

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL things unholy, prove me wrong…

People don't want to admit this, but young people are politically apathetic. Don't believe me? You could easily Google voter demographic turnout in American elections since the 1960s.

Young people just don't vote but love to whine.

I'm not saying this to dissuade people from voting, but the low turnout is a young people problem and I won't hold my breath whether or not they turn up in the next elections.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who the ever-loving-fuck is being polled? I don't know a single person who even knows a person who has been polled. Fuck these polls.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If you read the source of your link https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/technical-documentation/methodology.html You would know the census gets that data by polling…

[–] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

18-24 year olds are the least likely to vote.

To be fair, I wouldn’t expect a demographic cohort who are never going to own a house to be keen to turn out and vote for the people who created that situation.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

More from the cohort should run for office.

[–] Cobblepots@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They can't, they have to be 35

[–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

To run for President, yes. Bur, there are plenty of other offices they could run for at the local and state levels.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

How does that change their situation, exactly?

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They should turn out FOR THEMSELVES. The fuck?

load more comments
view more: next ›