this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
157 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

1451 readers
327 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Crash telemetry databases show a trend.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] huginn@feddit.it 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

My i9 13000 computer has been unstable since day 1. It mostly doesn't affect me since it seems to be most unstable at idle. There's always a chance when I step away for 20 minutes that I come back to a reset computer.

Tbh I just assumed it was windows this entire time.

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Check this out - I fixed mine using this. Mine was basically undervolted https://community.intel.com/t5/Processors/Unstable-i7-14700k/m-p/1569028

I have an MSI and needed to change ‘CPU Lite Load’ from Mode 9 to 13. You can then test with the XTU utility and AVX2 stress test to see if it fixed it

[–] punkfungus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately this is a separate issue. The main problem that is blowing up now is that the CPUs are rapidly degrading to the point of failure even with completely standard settings and normal usage. And ironically, boosting the voltage to solve the issue you're talking about might then accelerate the degradation issue, because the leading theory seems to be that the high voltage that i9s use is frying the ringbus.

All around just a terrible situation for Intel and their customers

[–] Laser@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

No customer deserves this but if you're buying Intel at this point, you can't be surprised. It always seemed that their only way to keep up with AMD is to pull some tricks like insane power draw and other shenanigans to beat them in some specific benchmarks and then use these as the definitive measurement for performance. I don't remember any innovation from them in the last 10 years (and frankly, before AMD released their Ryzens, it wasn't actually needed).

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah I’m getting an RMA. This solution gave me stability in the mean time though. I still have to pay shipping/handling though

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Lmao I think I was undervolting it to try and improve stability. I'll try the opposite, even if it does chew through the processor a bit quicker.

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Watch the temp. >90C is too high

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 4 months ago

It's been more than a year and I'd have to sell off my motherboard for a new socket and AMD.

I'll just roll with it until it burns out then jump ship.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Intel taking lessons from phone manufacturers, it seems. There's zero chance they didn't know about this problem if it's truly as prevalent as it seems to be.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

Problem? You see a problem?

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Glad I went with AMD this time round.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

I've always had bad luck with Intel CPU and ATI GPUs, so it's AMD CPUs and NVidia for me.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Good luck with the naming scheme although Intel is now just as bad if not worse

[–] neutronst4r@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

AMDs naming schemes have been exemplary ever since Ryzen came out.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Honestly I find Intel's to be a bit more confusing. Still, what my CPU is called exactly bothers me fairly little now that it's in my PC.

[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago

How is 12th gen not affected? Isn't it the same architecture? There were loads of stability issues with 12th gen when it released, though I think most of it may have just been related to DDR5 being new. My 12700k is running pretty stable, but on an old BIOS version. Every time I try upgrading the BIOS it becomes unstable so I just left it on what it is. But I'm open to some vulnerabilities now.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Intel, the Boeing of chip makers