this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
2256 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

5754 readers
2937 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

And do what with it? Just, like, fund society and shit? how are we going to grow extra assholes doing that?

[–] sag@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

100% It will work.

[–] Glass0448@lemmy.today 9 points 5 months ago

A fundamental misunderstanding of capitalism.

It's actually just hungry hungry hippos. And hippos can eat smaller hippos

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I say tax rates should be decided based on wealth shares.

Break it down like this, brackets set at the 20th, 40th, 60th, 80th, 95th, and 99th percentiles of household incomes.

People in the 20th 40th and 60th percentile brackets pay a tax rate equal to how much wealth is controlled by households in each of those brackets.

People in the 80 and 95 brackets pay twice the share they control.

People in the 99 bracket pay three times, and also can't hold public office for ten years after the last time they peak this bracket because, objectively, they are doing just fine for themselves and don't need to be going ahead of others who have actual problems a nation should be focused on addressing.

Also, with very few exceptions like a mortgage on a primary residence or a car loan for a primary vehicle, loans collateralized on capital assets are treated as income for tax purposes.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (11 children)

The central problem of a wealth tax is defining wealth. Real estate is relatively simple and well-tried, there's an appraisal process. But securities can fluctuate a lot. A billionaire CEO might turn into a millionaire after a bad earnings report, and end up paying taxes on wealth he was never able to actually have.

Then there's the whole infinite banking, living off loans secured with investments thing.

Not saying it's impossible, just difficult and complicated.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago (12 children)

I said in the thing, loans collateralized on capital assets are treated as income under this model

It's not a wealth tax, it's a tax on trying to avoid using that wealth through the bank shit.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Division of labor would suggest the people that are best at hunting money, hunt the money for the tribe while the others do other stuff.

[–] WanakaTree@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not gonna lie, had me in the first half

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Not me, but only because I've watched his videos on YouTube. The man is a brilliant comedian IMO.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›