this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
15 points (94.1% liked)

Furry Technologists

1315 readers
3 users here now

Science, Technology, and pawbs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More than likely. Our issues seem to stem more from GPU power and memory at this point.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

16 cores is the new four.

[–] Confetti_Camouflage@pawb.social 5 points 5 months ago

Unless the new chips have a massive gain in performance I would still be looking at the x3D vcache chips for gaming specifically.

[–] Dipole@pawb.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't aware that there were any games that could make meaningful use of 16 cores, let alone games that might want more. Was there a major advancement in game programming when I wasn't looking? Or is the headline as far off base as I think?

[–] anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz 2 points 4 months ago

@Dipole @stefenauris I mean maybe if you play Stationeers and got a large base haha, but that seems to be the only game I know that happily maxes out 32 threads or more if you push the physics simulation