this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
108 points (98.2% liked)

UK Politics

3109 readers
111 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] C4d@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s all very Yes Minister. I can hear Sir Humphrey and Bernard treating it as an irregular verb now:

“I’ve made an oversight, you have a conflict of interest, they are guilty of insider trading”

[–] Syldon 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She is the scapegoat. Sunak's family gained £1b from oil companies when he issued the 100 licenses recently. This just shows they are all grifting. Some are getting more than others though.

[–] C4d@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The oil thing is particularly intriguing. If I recall correctly the costs involved in exploration work can be used to mitigate against the windfall tax (I’m not sure though - someone please check).

[–] Syldon 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The BBCs take on the windfall tax. Inews did this article. Archive link. These are all well and good and explain the Tory spin on the windfall tax system. The reality is vastly different. Shell has paid no tax at all either windfall or standardised.

Weforum dug up the figures. The government introduced cop out clauses and believe it or not large companies are taking advantage of just that. Sunak's family benefit massively from oil profits, just as a matter of interest.

[–] C4d@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks. How wonderful.

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 8 points 1 year ago

The party of corruption. How are that party not in jail?

[–] sirico 7 points 1 year ago

"Failed" the poor love is she ok?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A former environment secretary has revealed she failed to declare tens of thousands of pounds of shares she held in oil giant Shell while in the role.

Ms Villiers, MP for the London seat of Chipping Barnet, alerted the Commons authorities "as soon as she realised this", the spokesman said.

This was more than a year before she was appointed to the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) under Boris Johnson in July 2019, a role she held until February 2020.

On 2 August, she registered a fifth stake over the amount in Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust, with records showing she held it between 6 and 20 July this year.

When Ms Villiers joined Defra, she told the department about her shares and offered to put them in a "blind" trust, where she would not have known how the money was invested, the spokesman said.

Asked about the omission on Sky News, Chief Secretary to the Treasury John Glen described it as an "oversight on her part" and insisted the former minister has been "very clear" in apologising.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] lanigerous 1 points 1 year ago