this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3103 readers
283 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreatAlbatross 17 points 1 year ago

I'm infuriated by this u-turn. The Ramblers spent large amounts of our time charting and preparing these cases, then once it became clear that we were going to fight tooth-and-nail, the time limit was abolished.

Now everything has spun down, they re-instate it! I half expected them to keep the original deadline, but at least there is a little more time.

[–] mdwhite999@vlemmy.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That really sucks. I live in Scotland where we have the right to roam so it's a shame to see access rights in England being so heavily curtailed

[–] SNEWSLEYPIES@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tories practically exist to fellate the landed gentry - they'll come for yours too given half a chance.

[–] mdwhite999@vlemmy.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well hopefully we don't give them even a quarter of a chance

[–] SNEWSLEYPIES@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Indeed, give them no quarter.

[–] Duck 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not shocked but I am quite peeved. Naturally the government would side with landowners - the rest of us are too poor. Additionally, England has quite the history of gating off spaces (parks and the like) for the upper classes and restricting access for the common people.

So it's not shocking. But irksome nonetheless.

[–] tenebrisnox 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely right. Even in towns and cities there have been (and still are) gardens and open spaces that are locked up to prevent access.

[–] tenebrisnox 4 points 1 year ago

Seems to me to be part of a wider-scale agenda to separate the rich and the poor in this country. Where I live development is concentrated in the town, cramming it full of more and more housing and multiple-occupied households. More and more people. Around us - where the rural rich live - it's almost undeveloped and, whenever a plan to build in the country is proposed it's shut down quite quickly (by what seem to be lobby groups).

Now the rural rich, sitting in their country houses, don't even want us commoners accessing the land. What we need in this country is a little land redistribution and more of the countryside taken into national ownership.