this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

19 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

In the past week, many supporters of former President Trump have made an argument in his defense that his indictment violates the norm against prosecuting former presidents. There is no such norm, and there never was.PwnAllTheThings is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pasci_lei@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would there be ever one? Being a (former) head of state doesn't include being above law, and it shouldn't ever be that way.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

well. So, like, there is a norm of not writing them speeding tickets. But there's a few reasons for this. the first being that the Secret Service provides drivers and they're trained to not stop. ever. (they also don't speed, but details.) there's a certain amount of leeway with petty things, and a large part of that is the secret service usually intervenes and intimidates the people/mechants/whatever making the claims so they go away.

Generally speaking, though, the reason these charges are unprecedented is because no ex president has ever committed these crimes. said another way, they're unprecedented because trump's criminality is unprecedented.

[–] markisus@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As the article mentions, there is no norm, but there is precedent for pardoning former presidents, due to Ford’s pardon of Nixon for Watergate. Trump may still be pardoned if the Republicans win the election.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Rachel Maddow had an interesting piece about how the DOJ kept Agnew from running, with a plea agreement.

load more comments
view more: next ›