this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
857 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2461 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JohnScig@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I see they are using the tactics of religion - get them young.

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 6 months ago

Oh hey it's that joke I made earlier. Fucking wonderful.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pieces of shit like this aren't worth the price of a bullet to put them out of our misery.

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They are not, but I'll gladly buy all the bullets required to keep children safe from religious idiots and republikkklowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
[–] helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today 7 points 6 months ago

wtf I thought this was the onion, I had to read where this came from like three times.

wtf..

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

WHAT THE FUCK

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Ugh, but guys palestine...

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

Is this a headline from 200 years ago??

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Probably on the latest version of Epstein's list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

In China, the phrase 豆蔻年华 refers to a girl of 13-14. Why? Because a famous poet likened the appearance of a child prostitute's developing vagina to a cardamom flower. Apparently that was totally fine, romantic even. I feel bad for the girl.

Anyway here's the flower:

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago

Where does the GOP get these guys?

[–] SeabassDan@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Turns out the reality behind that Shane Gillis bit was that they were trying to go even lower

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How does the New Hampshire House of Reps have 400 members?

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 4 points 6 months ago

Because a single representative represents a lot fewer people their.

[–] watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago

Why? WHY WHY WHY

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dudes anthem is Into the Night by Benny Mardones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Fire that pervert right now

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›