this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
339 points (98.8% liked)

Australia

3605 readers
69 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pantheon@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hopefully the ABC will follow the BBC in setting up accounts in the Fediverse

[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

German public broadcast also have their own mastodon instances:

https://ard.social/explore

https://zdf.social/@ZDF

And the German ARD is actually the biggest public broadcaster network in the world.

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

BBC went mastodon though. Which makes perfect sense: They've been heavy Twitter users.

The nature of what they do though lends itself better to Lemmy in my opinion: Post a link to the article, and have a threaded discussion exclusively relating to that matter contained in the post. I think it's more elegant than the trending hashtag thingy.

I'm also a windbag though, and prefer to have the option of longer-winded responses than the 500-character limit. A 500-character limit comment would end here.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m also a windbag though, and prefer to have the option of longer-winded responses than the 500-character limit. A 500-character limit comment would end here.

Firefish.social (or other Firefish instances) has your back FYI. IMO it's everything good about Mastodon in a nicer package with greater functionality. Federates with Mastodon, but has full (if basic) blogging (Pages they call them), and a default 4000 character limit on toots/microblog posts and comments.

This has become my reddit, but I really like Firefish as my twitter/mastodon/potential blog site. If I had to give up one of them, I'd keep Firefish.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem for media organisations with forum discussions (Lemmy, kbin, Reddit, actual forums) is that they have less control of the narrative. You need to employ (and provide mental health care) to moderators, which gets expensive quickly.

Mastodon (and other microblogs) are much more convenient because the publisher can dump their headline and blurb, but don’t need to maintain the discussion further. If a dog-pile happens, it doesn’t effect the original content.

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Well they could spin up an instance that is only for @abc.au addresses, then post here... I'd feel a lot less worried about communities with ABC trademarks like "Bluey" and "Rage" it they were among us and posting here.

I know Reddit has /r/bluey and ABC has not appeared to go after them. So, I may be concerned over nothing.

[–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

It would be so cool if they set up instances!

[–] nEODiE@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Hopefully this is the beginning of a trend

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The ABC is shutting down almost all of its official accounts on Twitter – now known as X under Elon Musk’s ownership – citing “toxic interactions”, cost and better interaction with ABC content on other social media platforms.

Anderson said the closure of the Insiders, News Breakfast and ABC Politics accounts earlier this year limited the amount of toxic interactions which had grown more prevalent under Musk and made engagement with the shows more positive.

“We also found that closing individual program accounts helps limit the exposure of team members to the toxic interactions that unfortunately are becoming more prevalent on X,” he said.

The announcement comes after the corporation recently shifted resources towards making content for other social media platforms including TikTok and Instagram.

Anderson said the vast majority of the ABC’s social media audience was located on official sites on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.

The ABC is the third big public service broadcaster to remove itself from Twitter, following NPR and PBS in April.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting that they point out closing the Insiders account - from my perspective it seemed like running away from viewers who were begging them to actually ask relevant questions of guests, such as the live royal Commission that didn't get a mention for 4 weeks.

[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Do you mean this royal comission?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psq52CUjqJI

That topic has been discussed regularly by ABC and on Insiders since 2016. So what if they covered other topics for a few episodes? It's a talk show. The topics and timing are limited by the availability of people on the panel.

If you want good coverage, by people who know what they're talking about, you have to wait for them to be available.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

It's not like we're in a dead news cycle at the moment either. There is tons going on and that means a lot of competition for what gets a mention on the program.

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps I should've been more specific - the Insiders twitter had been shut down since near the start of the year.

The first four (at least) episodes of the show featured no mention of the royal Commission, which at the time was releasing damning findings and testimony what seemed like every few days. It was big news - just not on Insiders, where they can actually interview those part of it.

The insiders Twitter was full of people pointing out the lack of coverage, with no acknowledgement except for an abrupt shut down.

Really felt reminiscent of the 'don't mention NBN' in Q+A years ago.

[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago

social media in general has just become cookers shouting at each other and anyone that will listen, twitter more than most. nothing would be lost by stopping to fuel the Qaddicts lunacy

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Title is a bit misleading:

The ABC is shutting down almost all of its official accounts on Twitter – now known as X under Elon Musk’s ownership – citing “toxic interactions”, cost and better interaction with ABC content on other social media platforms.

There will only be four remaining official ABC accounts: @abcnews, @abcsport, @abcchinese and the master @abcaustralia account. ABC Chinese reaches Chinese-speaking audiences on X.

“Starting from today, other ABC accounts will be discontinued,” the ABC managing director, David Anderson, has told staff.

So they're keeping their main, largest accounts alive.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised they stuck with Twitter even though they were labelled as state media

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would they leave over that? That's just a fact. They are state media. YouTube shows the same label.

Sure, it's a bit unfair to tar the ABC with the same brush as RT, but it's reasonably easy for a viewer to see that one is state media of Australia and the other is state media of Russia, and that those two are obviously not equivalent.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

It's exactly that it harms their credibility when they are associated with RT. Apparently PBS and BBC left Twitter because of that

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. Not sure why anyone is still on there

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Sunk cost fallacy, I guess. There's also no clear alternative at the moment (at least for normies, who are the people still using Twitter). No one seems to like Threads and everything else is either too small or too confusing. The few Twitter users I know seem more interested in Bluesky than Mastodon, I guess because of its ties to Twitter and the very similar UI.

[–] SirSpud@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Bets on which news broadcaster will be the next one to pull out? Seeing Twitter's (sorry, X's) downfall in real-time is quite satisfying.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't mind reading the ABC news headlines direct or getting it second hand from lemmy posts to aussie.zone. I find the Twitter/X model annoying and a waste of time and Mastodon is only a little better. Too much noise. It is a shame they recently killed their RSS feeds as it was the OG fediverse and I could see myself going back to using an RSS reader as the rest of the Internet keeps getting shittier.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago
[–] alaxitoo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I saw on X (lol) that abcbrisbane was being archived, now I know why thank you 🙏

[–] quitenormal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surprised to know they even had an account there in the first place.

[–] Default@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Why wouldn't they have? Unfortunately every media organisation used Twitter