this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
1032 points (81.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9788 readers
517 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 133 points 7 months ago (24 children)

What do families do, that only want or need to live in a place or area for like a year or so? Buy a house, pay thousands in closing costs and inspections, lose several thousand to realtors, and then have to go through the trouble of trying to sell the place a year later?

We very much need landlords. What's screwing everything up is corpos doing it as a business or individuals with like 20 homes instead of one or two. Renting a house is a viable need for some people and it would actually suck if it was an option that didn't exist at all.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 66 points 7 months ago (9 children)

The only reason costs of houses are so high in the first place is because they are lucrative investment objects, along with the fact that the most important part of city (and rural) planning, building homes, is largely left to private companies. You are assuming houses would be just as inaffordable without landlords, which is a problem of the current paradigm and not the one proposed.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Specal@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (3 children)

There's no reason that local governments can't do this job, there's no need for middle men leaching money.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (3 children)

But you could replace just about any product with that statement.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (14 children)

Now, you’re getting it…

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Some of the biggest law breakers and abusive landlords are independent landlords. They're also the ones who don't seem to realize that being a landlord is a full time job where you are the handy man, maintenance, property manager, etc. It's not just collecting a cheque every month, you actually have to earn it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] stanka@lemmy.ml 72 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Rental income is considered income, and taxed assuming reasonable tax brackets much higher than investment income (That is to say, caiptal-gains. Interest/Dividends are also taxed at the higher income rate)

The cost of maintaining a livable home, property taxes, insurance, property depreciation, and renter interactions eat into the supposed windfall that landlords make.

I'm not saying it doesn't suck sometimes and that certainly these formulas are out of whack in some situations, but there are no easy answers.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 62 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Set some limits. Each person can own one primary residence and x number of secondary dwellings. Each additional dwelling is taxed at a higher rate than the one before.

People can still buy themselves a house and maybe another couple houses or condos for their family or investment.

But big landlords can't profitably buy up neighborhoods then crank up the rent. Or perhaps they can own them, but they're required to be non-profits and expenses and rents are highly controlled relative to income in the area.

It's a tough problem to solve though... Huge apartment buildings do have economies of scale that permit high density living.

And property owners who don't sell or develop their land at all because there's not enough incentive are a big problem in other parts of the world.

[–] Kacarott@feddit.de 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I really like the idea to tax each house successively more. And the money made from these taxes could specifically go to the government buying houses and turning them into social housing, or perhaps providing big discounts for first home buyers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bricriu@lemmy.world 60 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I would argue that a live-in landlord that does maintenance work or acts as a building super is in fact doing a job.

Otherwise, agreed.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 82 points 7 months ago (20 children)

Building maintenance can absolutely be a job, which is wholey separate from being a landlord.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 50 points 7 months ago (57 children)

I am a landlord and also have a full time job. I also spend my time fixing my units.

With the maintenance cost and taxes, I'm actually losing money or breaking even depending on the year.

My tenants are living in a house that they wouldn't be able to afford on their own in today's market. Being able to live near their work.

So why am I the bad guy?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 64 points 7 months ago (13 children)

With the maintenance cost and taxes, I’m actually losing money or breaking even depending on the year.

My tenants are living in a house that they wouldn’t be able to afford on their own in today’s market.

Literally the hottest real estate market in history, after we just came out of the lowest interest rate market in history, and my man up here still can't even break even on a residence he is renting out to someone else out of the pure kindness of heart.

Maybe you are the rare, golden One Good Landlord, or maybe you're just some asshole on the internet posting utter bullshit. Who can say?

But I've never met any landlord like you IRL. Hell, I've never actually met a landlord who owned the property I rented. They always went through property management companies that do all the work for the owner and just forwarded on a chunk of my rental payment at the end of every month.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I do accounting for a lot of landlords. What he's talking about is cash flow. Almost nobody ends up with taxable income from renting because the rent goes to the mortgage, property tax, insurance, maintenance, etc.

Before you crucify me on a barbed wire Popsicle stick, the part he's leaving out is the equity he's building at the tenant's expense.

When he eventually sells the place, he'll get hundreds of thousands of dollars that didn't cost him anything. Whoever lived there just gets memories of that place they used to sleep in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Apollo42@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (24 children)

Those people are able to live in the house you took off the market (thus driving up the price of housing) and pay off your mortgage.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

I don't know which particular Market you're in, but in the majority of cases, especially around me, if a bank would just fucking approve me for a loan I would pay notably less per month then I pay a landlord for rent.

And it's not like I even have a bad credit I'm in the 740s but since the fake imaginary value of properties is skyrocketed to the point that even a piece of shit falling apart house is almost a million dollars I can't get the kind of down payment they want. So despite the fact that the mortgage would literally be cheaper per month I can't get one.

And that situation exists thanks to people snapping up properties especially large companies and turning them into investment rental properties

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you're losing money with your properties, why not just sell them to your tenants for an affordable price?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

If we remove landlords from the picture, we get a bunch of housing on the market.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

My tenants are living in a house that they wouldn’t be able to afford on their own in today’s market.

zero self-awareness fuckin lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You sound honest, but usually the internet speaks of generalizations. You may be an exception to that norm.

Otherwise; no, you don't sound like the bad guy

The big corps making profits is what the post is about, I think.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (11 children)

Folks, there's a difference between a slumlord and a decent landlord. I've owned a house for ten years now, and in addition to the mortgage and taxes and insurance I pay every month for the privelege, I've had to spend tens of thousands replacing the roof and doing other regular maintenance tasks. I'm actually about to dump thirty percent of the original purchase price into more deferred repairs and maintenance to get it back to a point where all the finished space is habitable again. Owning a house is expensive in ways that I did not fully understand until I bought mine, and decent property managers are taking care of all that for you, and if that's not a job I honestly don't know what is.

Slumlords and corporate landlords can fuck right the hell off, though.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] breakcore@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

My boyfriend and I have discussed moving out of his parents' house for many years now. We discussed renting, but then I realized it was just cheaper to buy a house in a small town. We wouldn't even be able to afford to rent in the larger town over that's closer to his job and a friend of ours told us about how a ghost company bought out her old place, raised the rent another two hundered dollars when they were already struggling to get by, and didn't even tell people about it until two weeks before the new year. My friends were able to move out when they did only because of rumors floating around.

My mother and I were forced to live in an apartment after we moved when I was a teenager, but the only reason we got in was because the older guy who owned them knew my mom's dad and used to go hunting with them when they were young. He was kind enough to cut us a deal. That's literally the ONLY reason we didn't end up on the streets. Her sibling said we could live at their place until my mother found a job, but about two weeks later kicked us out because "my husband and I have sex every Saturday and we just can't do that anymore because your son is in the house."

I knew what sex was, I was old enough to understand, and I told my mom that we could just leave the house for a while every Saturday. It really wasn't an issue. But no, the person who convinced my mother to move multiple states away from where we used to and convinced my mom that the job market was absolutely booming (it was absolutely NOT) basically told us to fuck off.

Now that we lived in an apartment in the middle of buttfuck nowhere, my mom jobless and sending applications to any place around us to no avail, we were fucking stuck.

The apartment had many issues and the man and woman who helped the older man run the apartment were hillbilly rigging everything that broke so it just broke again. Over and over.

Eventually, and sadly, the owner of the apartments passed away (the guy actually built the apartments himself with the help of his son) and his son wanted nothing with the place. It took a good year for the apartments to sell to someone else. I went to school with her son and she was kind enough to not raise rent, but eventually she sold them off, too.

It was too much work for her husband and herself and her youngest graduated with me, so she sold the apartments to some jackass in Tennessee.

The rent doubled. There was fucking NOTHING we could do about it. The guy who bought them was hours away from us and had his underlings hire cheap labor to start ripping everything apart.

The people who lived in these apartments weren't rich or had a lot of money. Many were elderly and had nowhere to go, yet they had to leave. My mother was one of them. I helped her move with my boyfriend and we found her a place, but holy fuck, apartments suck. Landlords especially.

Some rich fuck who has no idea what the local economy is like, buys some apartments for cheap, then thinks it is a good investment.

My boyfriend and I are doing our best to currently find a place, but not everyone can buy an entire house to live in. Not everyone has a good enough credit score or people to help them when they are in need.

I've seen a few people talk in the comments about how they own apartments and rent them and are "one of the good ones", and sure, some landlords will work with people. I've witnessed it myself, but only out of luck as stated above. The vast majority of landlords are jackasses who only want to line their pockets with money, and even if it isn't a specific landlord, some scam company can easily buy the apartments and fuck everyone over.

Being a landlord isn't a job. Taking money from vulnerable people isn't a job. If you go out of your way to work on the apartments you own, good for you I guess. Congrats. Woo. But you still chose to own apartments or rent out a house. You CHOSE to line your pockets with money from people who are desperate to have shelter, but not everyone has a choice in deciding to rent.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Sidhean@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Threads like this really stress me out. I live in the US, and I've always wanted to rent long-term. I've obviously also always wanted a less broken system. If renting was the cheaper option and there were more legal protections for tenants, I think being an independent landlord of a very small number of properties can be well-done. We need to fix a lot before this ever becomes viable, and the stranglehold corps are gaining on the housing market is a fucking crime against humanity. Those fucks are parasites.

I think the real problem isn't landlording, exactly, but the capitalists we've propped up along the way :3

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] june@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I collect rent from a roommate. The unemployment office doesn’t consider it income so it doesn’t impact my unemployment payout.

The government doesn’t even consider landlord income to be employment income.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (11 children)

Do you own the property? If not, you're a tenant and it isn't treated as income because it isn't income. They're just paying their part of a shared rent through you.

If you are the owner, they aren't your roommate, they're your tenant, and maybe you should get these terms clear before you file your taxes again.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 23 points 7 months ago (26 children)

Being a good landlord can be a job, depending on the home and the needs of the tenants and whether or not they're able so whatever work is needed for the place.

The problem is most just want the returns of an investment without the risks of such, and without ever putting any further "investment" into the property after purchase.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Housing as an investment should not exist as a concept. Housing is to provide shelter and comfort, not generate wealth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago (5 children)

You'd have to get rid of the concept of private property and that isn't going anywhere. Same with landlords.

You're not going to vote this out of the system.

[–] drahardja@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You don’t need to get rid of private property to undo a lot of the damage done by landlords. You can build subsidized housing to compete. You can write tax codes to make it unprofitable for people to own more than one house. You can tax land by area instead of by built value to encourage building high-density housing.

There are a lot of levers that other countries have been willing to pull that partially counteract the damage of landlording, but the US has been reluctant to touch.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Got a lot of angry landlords in these comments. Oops.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Be a landlord

Pay a cleaning crew to handle the janitorial services.

Pay a contractor to handle repairs.

Pay a management company to handle the day-to-day activities.

Complain that I'm not making enough money on the property.

Raise the rent to the market-clearing price.

Demand the municipal government lower my taxes, because its the only way to incentivize me to buy more property.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (9 children)

I don't get it.. if someone works and invests in a property, they pay a significant amount of money to have and maintain that property. If someone can only afford to rent for a short term period of time, what then? Is the next step that the person spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a house supposed to just hand it over without selling it to a tenant? What is the alternative?

[–] OftenWrong@startrek.website 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Put a limit on how many single family homes anyone can own. Especially corporations. They should honestly be banned from owning these homes at all. The housing market will adjust naturally without all these shitty big companies scooping up homes and making them inaccessible to buyers.

Individuals should also be limited on how many homes they can own if anything to prevent corporations from exploiting loopholes and having individual people "own" them instead. But also because it's just morally wrong to hoard property in the first place. I pay more in rent than I would on a mortgage but I can't afford the down payment for the very few homes that are even available within a reasonable distance from my job. Even if I could so many companies smatch them up over the asking price so people don't have a chance.

People like me that could financially afford the payments on their own homes are blocked by bullshit that was created solely to keep them perpetually renting. It's wrong. I shouldn't have to move to a whole new state or two hours away from my job because the same big company has bought up every house here. Not to mention a bunch of them recently got busted for illegally controlling the rent prices across multiple companies/properties using some kind of third party algorithm.

I don't think anyone should have to give up their property for free but if we're paying someone else's mortgage we should be getting more than a roof over our head.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›