World's largest settler colony votes in favour of colonialism. More at 11
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
234 points (98.8% liked)
World News
32519 readers
488 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
For some reason this comment helped me relax a bit about this. Wild how slow progress is
For some reason
This is the reason:
"You know what I've noticed? Nobody panics when things go "according to plan." Even if the plan is horrifying!
Very insightful. I'll be using this in the future. Thanks!
Somewhat more surprising is the historical king of colonizers didn't vote in favor of it.
The US supplanted the UK as the de facto leader of the imperial core after WW2, and specially after the Suez crisis.
The UK can't afford to antagonize the world by directly voting against international will anymore like the US now can, hence them (and Switzerland) only abstaining.
The British people aren't that pro-imperialist in general anymore and, while the current government very much IS, I'm pretty sure that it's almost election time, so they have to be careful about being too honest about it right now..
"Are we the baddies?"
and there it is. I can't think of a clearer way of messaging the U.S.'s stance on helping palestineans.
Was it ever in doubt?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
U.S. deputy ambassador Robert Wood told the Security Council that the veto “does not reflect opposition to Palestinian statehood but instead is an acknowledgment that it will only come from direct negotiations between the parties.”
Ambassador Riyad Mansour told the council after the vote: “The fact that this resolution did not pass will not break our will and it will not defeat our determination.”
Mansour, the Palestinian U.N. ambassador, reiterated the commitment to a two-state solution but asserted that Israel believes Palestine “is a permanent strategic threat.”
Ambassador Gilad Erdan called the resolution “disconnected to the reality on the ground” and warned that it “will cause only destruction for years to come and harm any chance for future dialogue.”
Six months after the Oct. 7 attack by the Hamas militant group, which controlled Gaza, and the killing of 1,200 people in “the most brutal massacre of Jews since the Holocaust,” he accused the Security Council of seeking “to reward the perpetrators of these atrocities with statehood.”
After the vote, Erdan thanked the United States and particularly President Joe Biden “for standing up for truth and morality in the face of hypocrisy and politics.”
The original article contains 952 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
This is why we can't have nice things.