this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
115 points (98.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54788 readers
675 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jugalator@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

The main feature is that you’ll never have problem with too few or no seeders again, and everything will be fast always, and no one will ask or expect you to seed. Some have retention period on the content for like a decade.

[–] nix@merv.news 2 points 1 year ago (9 children)

But if the uploader stops hosting the file everyone loses the ability to download?

[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

No, if the server you use stops hosting the file, then you can't download it. Other people might still be able to, if their server still has the file. Most servers seem to do at least 3000 days retention, and others I've seen do 5000 days, so anything recent is probably gonna be there.

Its the same with torrents though, with the exception that hardly any torrent still has seeders after 5000 days. Usenet is more reliable in that regard, because you dont have to worry that older files won't have enough seeders for you to grab the whole thing.

[–] Acid@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

It's also why most people suggest multiple server providers on different backbones that solves that issue most of the time.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)