this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
338 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37604 readers
185 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone 158 points 1 year ago (32 children)

honestly we should have collectively realized way earlier that putting all the useful, readable, un-touched-by-SEO help content for basically every niche hobby fandom and ideology in the hands of one for-profit entity was not very wisdom-pilled of us

[–] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

we can still easily fall into this trap if there isn't a good way to migrate communities between instances. And even if we could just take /c/technology@beehaw.org and move the whole thing to /c/technology@feddit.de or something, that would still break all the indexers' links

[–] lovesyouandhugsyou@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What we really need is some sort of torrent-like system for this content with something equivalent to magnet links.

[–] shiftenter@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] syboxez@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love the idea of IPFS, but every time I've tried to use it, it has always been very slow.

[–] Babalas@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

amusingly another chicken egg problem. More chickens, faster the eggs. Wait that metaphor works!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)