this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
153 points (96.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43958 readers
1849 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mine is the computer. I continue to be amazed at what we can do with them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MxM111@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[โ€“] waz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Interesting, my first thought was similar but different.

Clothing.

Now I have to go poke around the Internet trying to understand the history of both, which came first, and speculate about which made a bigger impact on our species.

edit:

Yep, it was fire. By like a lot. Both have pretty big ranges, but fire seems to be in the hundreds of thousands of years ago range, and clothing seems to be in the dozens of thousands of years.

[โ€“] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 2 points 7 months ago

I wonder which one came first, clothing or hairless skin?