this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
96 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37757 readers
632 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Its not helping Biden not being able to censor information on his part genocide. None of them gave a fuck about tiktok until they told em to take down pro Palestinian content and got told "lulnope"

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Tiktok has been a subject of national security concerns since at least 2020.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

With absolutely zero tangible evidence, which is why it was a complete non-starter for four years until Biden lost control of the narrative.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Well, no. The courts struck down Trump's Tiktok ban because he used an executive order that overstepped his authority.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because executive order was the only way to get it done - other methods would have required evidence that doesn't exist. You're only backing my argument lmao.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago

That's the opposite of what the court said.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)