this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
143 points (96.7% liked)

Science

13007 readers
62 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astramist@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What could possibly be OK with Starlink if it has THIS?

[–] iraq_lobster@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well in fact there are multiple sat trains over the northern hemisphere lol ( and some on the south), according to the online sat tracker. apparently those trains help mitigate peak hour bandwidth usage, but i dont know better. still, thats an abnormal sight to have.

[–] astramist@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I recognize Starlink's advantage over other providers, but just compare the number of satellites they have.

  • Viasat: 2, plans to launch a third.
  • HughesNet: 3.
  • Starlink: Over 3,000. Plans to increase to 12,000. Each of them must be replaced every 5 years. At the same time, SpaceX doesn't yet have any ideas on how to bring old satellites down to Earth.

WTF?! Starlink provides such a better service to justify the multiple satellite count difference? This is despite the fact that they have a short lifespan and often go out of their orbit and smash into space debris, increasing the amount of space debris. Huh...