this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
65 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
188 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Automattic purchases Beeper in $125 million deal; CEO to join

https://blog.beeper.com/2024/04/09/beeper-is-joining-automattic/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Paywall ʕ ͡° ʖ̯ ͡°ʔ

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Adding these rules to uBlock Origin allowed me to read the article:

www.bloomberg.com * 3p-frame block
www.bloomberg.com coordinator.cm.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com eventrecorder.cm.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com gatehouse.cm.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com login.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com personalization.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com sourcepointcmp.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com doubleclick.net * block
www.bloomberg.com google.com * block
www.bloomberg.com googlesyndication.com * block
www.bloomberg.com googletagmanager.com * block
www.bloomberg.com ml314.com * block
www.bloomberg.com moatads.com * block
www.bloomberg.com newrelic.com * block
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] remington@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

Yup. Been using it for years.

[–] zout@fedia.io 1 points 7 months ago

Will look into that, thanks.

load more comments (6 replies)