this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

33 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

Yes this has been asked and answered a million times I’m sure. There is a plethora of ‘top ten distros for Linux gaming’ lists out there and the majority of posts I can find on That Other Site seem to devolve into “every distro can do games”.

I’m interested in what you are using and your experience doing so. Any gotchas you wished you knew? Anything you tried that didn’t work, or anything that worked unexpectedly well? What would you say if your friend asked this over a few pints down the pub?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alexmitter@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Fedora without any question. There is no other distro this polished.

[–] jakwithoutac 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Worried about the Red Hat nonsense at all? I’m not super plugged into the news on it all.

[–] polygon@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The way it was explained to me was Fedora = RHEL Alpha, CentOS Stream = RHEL Beta, RHEL is Stable, then there are downstreams who build against RHEL. Only those who are downstream of REHL are effected by the changes. Both Fedora and Cent are necessary development platforms to support everything that eventually makes it down to RHEL in stable condition. They both depend on RHEL for funding, but RHEL depends on them for testing.

[–] jakwithoutac 1 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, so only downstream should be affected (if it even ever is). There will be other people who will find these projects I’d bet if it ever comes to it

[–] Mane25 1 points 1 year ago

It's a healthy setup with Fedora, Red Hat are incentivised to support Fedora by their business model, they could be the most evil company in the world (which they're not) but it's incentives that matter. That would only change if Red Hat completely change their business model, pissing off some downstream distributors isn't a blip on the radar.

load more comments (1 replies)