this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
178 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

34838 readers
23 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Phrenology, voice stress analysis, lie detectors, etc. - There's a long list of things that don't really work being used by law enforcement to help put lot of innocent people in prison.

Fingerprints might not be on the same level of fraudulent bullshit of the above, but they also shouldn't be the unquestionable end-all be-all of proof either.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They aren't on the same level of fraudulent bullshit, but they're close.

Fingerprint matching is done "by eye" and often involves an "expert" saying that one smudge is a 100% match for another smudge.

DNA matching is the only forensic science that's worth a damn, and only if it's done correctly.

[–] tuxrandom@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

DNA matching is the only forensic science that's worth a damn, and only if it's done correctly.

And even that one is useless in case of identical twins.

load more comments (1 replies)