this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

17528 readers
305 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is there an elegant, cross-platform, way to determine the latest Unicode version that a machine supports?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] hunger@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "system support"? The system is mostly pushing bytes along, the programming languages/UI ovaries tend to do all the hard work. So it is usually more interesting to see what those support.

[โ€“] mron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Emoji support is probably the best way to demonstrate what I mean:

A simple example: if this (๐Ÿฆโ€โฌ›) renders as an image of a blackbird, your system supports Unicode 15.0.

A more complex example: if this (๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ) appears as a judge, your system supports Unicode 12.1, if it appears as a Person followed by Scales your system supports Unicode 10.0, and if you can only see the Scales, your system supports Unicode 4.1.

The downstream use case would be to avoid attempting to output specific characters for a user that wouldn't see them correctly (i.e. if I want to output a blackbird, I want them to see it, or if I output a judge I don't want them to see scales).