Asklemmy

43396 readers

1269 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

How will lemmy scale? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by phoneymouse@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I already get rate-limited like crazy on lemmy and there are only like 60,000 users on my instance. Is each instance really just one server or are there multiple containers running across several hosts? I’m concerned that federation will mean an inconsistent user experience. Some instances many be beefy, others will be under resourced… so the average person might think Lemmy overall is slow or error-prone.

Reddit has millions of users. How the hell is this going to scale? Does anyone have any information about Lemmy’s DB and architecture?

I found this post about Reddit’s DB from 2012. Not sure if Lemmy has a similar approach to ensure speed and reliability as the user base and traffic grows.

https://kevin.burke.dev/kevin/reddits-database-has-two-tables/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Poorly. Lemmy will scale poorly.

I won't be surprised if the larger instances start locking down more as a way to sustain themselves, like restricting communities or only allowing text posts.

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Sometimes you have just to accommodate to the situation and keep going until it settles down. The error I think here is thinking something can’t have flaws and issues, even more if it’s not behind a corporations. And no one wants corporations.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It isn't about accommodating to the situation, but planning for long term growth.

Right now, instances of Lemmy don't have any way to fund server costs other than asking for donations. Outside of Wikipedia, that isn't a sustainable business model. How is Lemmy supposed to survive if, every time a sub gains critical mass, it shuts down?

[–] notavote@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It is not like any other social network has become sustainable business. Reddit, Twitter, YouTube, FB all are net losers with all trials with and selling user data.

We can safely say that after almost 20 we still don't have sustainable business model for soc networks.

Let's try with donations.

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (12 replies)