Old School Runescape

1668 readers

8 users here now

The community for Old School RuneScape discussion on Lemmy. The recreation of a beloved Reddit subreddit. Join us and post your accomplishments, goals and game memes!

Rules:

Post must be on topic to Old School.
No posts or conversation related to breaking in game rules.
Keep things civil.
No begging or self promotion.

Game Links:

RuneLite (third-party Jagex approved client)

HDOS (third-party Jagex approved client)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dinosoup@lemmy.world

GetsThruBuckner@lemmy.world

Skilling as an ironman (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by bobbean@lemmy.world to c/2007scape@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Looking on the wiki, it feels like some skilling guides don't take into account the opportunity cost of grinding other skills or grinding for gp. Sure, I can buy logs for fletching and get 100k xp/hr, but that doesn't take into account the 100k gp/hr required to do that. It's not really 100k xp/hr anymore. There's also fletching broad arrows, which the wiki says "are not very useful for anything" and are also expensive. It feels silly to make a ton of resources that are just going to be thrown away, when instead arrows can be made to level ranged.

The most efficient skilling methods also seem circular. If I want to grind x I should level y, but I need z to be efficient. And to get z I need to grind x. There's also what feels like a lack of skilling options listed. Sometimes I want to do "dead content" for the fun of it.

I'm definitely just a noob, but discovering new stuff to do is hard sometimes. I also am aware that I'm contradicting myself a bit by wanting a more efficient guide but also wanting dead content lol. But anyway, are there any resources available that might help me out?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Reading this:

The most efficient skilling methods also seem circular. If I want to grind x I should level y, but I need z to be efficient. And to get z I need to grind x. There's also what feels like a lack of skilling options listed. Sometimes I want to do "dead content" for the fun of it.

Just made me think "congrats, you've found the core gameplay loop of RS". I know its not obvious when you're new to the game but thats the fun of it. I want to enjoy the forestry update to the fullest but to be at max efficiency I'd need to do Temple Trekking and Dagganoth Kings. I said fuck that and just went for it.

Efficiencyscape is a fallacy pushed by the players (who are a VERY vocal minority on reddit in particular, and I'm sure here if the community takes off) who really need to touch grass. Plus its not really always practical for Ironman. Hell, I'm doing battlestaves because I have excessive comics from GotR, hate glass blowing, and it makes me money (which I can do as filler activity while doing Agility) Yea, its less xp/hr than glass, but fuck that.

Honestly I feel that grinding less efficient "dead" (fuck that word too, leads straight to powercreep) content that you find fun will be better than boring content for the sake of effieciency.

[–] Pure_Decimation@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I want to enjoy the forestry update to the fullest but to be at max efficiency I'd need to do Temple Trekking and Dagganoth Kings. I said fuck that and just went for it.

I got my 99 wc with a rune axe. It's really not that much slower and with as afkable as a skill as wc is, who really cares if it takes an extra hour or two. People need to learn to play the game how they want to and just have fun.

load more comments (2 replies)