this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Books
1 readers
1 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Realistically, Forrest Gump was a great movie and a terrible adaptation.
The book was cartoonish and damn-near unreadable.
Begs the question though; is an adaptation “bad” just because it’s inaccurate?
I’d argue taking poorly written source material and salvaging it into something decent makes it a great adaptation, just not a faithful one
For it to be a great adaptation it needs to be faithful. It can be a great movie, but as an adaptation it sucks BECAUSE it's not faithful. That's how i look at it.