General Discussion

1 readers

1 users here now

More focused on general discussion and open-ended questions. For news and latest events, please use !main@soccer.forum.

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@soccer.forum

Unpopular opinion, maybe? 5 subs is bad. (alien.top)

submitted 9 months ago by mr_greenmash@alien.top to c/talk@soccer.forum

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

5 subs is stupid. 3 subs were far better. Now, you can replace half the outfield players, which basically means you can change tactics completely. It means more of the result is down to the manager. It also means there's less need to prioritise which games are important, you can start with your best 11 every game, and just substitute later if the result allows it. It also benefits clubs with bigger budgets more, as they can afford having a higher quality bench.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KingKFCc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

5 subs is better with the current game schedule no doubt, there are so many games and professionals are getting injured constantly, but in all honesty 2 extra subs probably won't help considering the stubbornness of alot of managers, UEFA needs to make the game schedules better and have less games and then move it down to 3

[–] mr_greenmash@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

UEFA needs to make the game schedules better and have less games and then move it down to 3

Agree!