this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
-4 points (38.9% liked)

privatelife - privacy, security, freedom advocacy

1558 readers
1 users here now

This community is meant to advocate privacy, security and freedom in an concise manner, free of prejudice bias, free of politics, free of cultist thoughts.

Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say. - Edward Snowden

Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/privatelife

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#privatelife:matrix.org

Telegram: https://t.me/r_privatelife

READ THE RULES

  1. Opinions are welcome, facts more so. Attack arguments, not people. Hating, baiting, trolling, flaming will be dealt with strictly.

  2. Discuss closed source software with caution. Advocating for it strongly (cult brigading) can be treated as violation of this rule.

  3. Editing titles of article links is strictly prohibited, unless and until the summarisation remains accurate to the context of the article or paper. Such link post will be removed without questioning.

  4. Targeting of any country, person or nation is strictly prohibited without valid reasoning. Evidence if not presented against the specific company/corporation/individual will be treated as personal attack and/or hate speech. This will result in a warning, then ban system.

  5. NO PERMA BANS! Ban system will work as follows:

1 day --> 3 day --> 1 week --> 2 weeks --> 3 weeks --> 1 month --> 3 months --> 6 months

Severity of the ban system will be dealt with based on degree of violation and circumstances.

  1. NO FACT-LESS EVIDENCES, NO FALSE RHETORIC Evidence has to be credible. The onus of this lies on the claimant. The same applies on the user who questions proven evidence. Violation of this rule will be dealt with strictly.

  2. Copycat posts serve to litter the community, increasing quantity and decreasing quality of posts. As such, posts will be removed. Repeated attempts will receive warning.


Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
 

Whenever I encounter the label "made in EU", "Germany", "Estonia", "France" ...... in the footer of a web project, which implies enhanced data-protection, apparently, I wonder:

How can it be so? There're some data-protection laws, yes. But one can't control a hosting provider 24h/day. One can't know whether an employer there copies all data on his memory-drivers.

Can't the police, if need be, seize a server as easily as it would in any other country on Earth?

Don't the majority of all of countries in Europe share information with the intelligence of US by the agreements of the 5 eyes, 9 eyes, 14 eyes? Whereas the 2nd and 3rd world countries don't.

How is it better than a label "made in South Africa", "Thailand", "Costa Rica", "Egypt", "Kuwait"?

I can see how "made in Germany" or EU makes a project worse in terms of privacy and data-protection. How could it make it better, though?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Can’t the police, if need be, seize a server as easily as it would in any other country on Earth?

Yes. No privacy protections anywhere in the world protect criminal suspects from warranted surveillance. Privacy laws are only intended to protect non-suspects from unreasonable unwarranted searches.

[–] nothingness@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Then why don't you go to North Korea? Or Iran? Or China. According to you, if you do nothing wrong, you won't have any problem there. And if you end up with a problem with a police there, then you're a criminal, therefore must be punished anyway.

[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You are quite confused. The places you list are places that do not have privacy protections for non-criminals. Europe is where a law-abiding person is least likely to be unreasonably searched or interrogated.

[–] nothingness@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

You are quite naive - unable to see 2 steps ahead of your own reasoning.